>>5038579 (pb)
some comments
>>5038579 (pb)
some comments
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/02/syria-sitrep-us-says-it-will-retreat-but-adds-troops-arms-and-ammunition.html
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/757193/world-war-3-putin-russia-tanks-nato-invasion
Petri explained: "Russian tactics rely on concentrating an overwhelming force to a focal point, something the rather small western tank fleets have a hard time countering.
"Also Russian tank and motorised rifle formations have vastly greater indirect firepower at their disposal than their western counterparts. In a modern peer level war the few slightly better western tanks that could be sent to the fight would meet numerically superior Russian formations that rain artillery and rocket fire every step of the way."
The military analyst went on to explain that countering this deadly attack would be a "nightmare" for NATO forces because they do not have the necessary armoury to fight back.
He added: "Counter-attacking against a Russian tank army would be a nightmare.
https://southfront.org/su-35s-multi-role-air-superiority-fighter/
"The Su-35S is a single-seat multi-role air superiority fighter jet. It’s the top Russian air-superiority fighter in service today."
check comments very interesting discussion
nukes no work they are fake and gay, fear porn
top kek