And then promised universal family leave. Because somehow fascism
is better than socialism.
Just like the arm-chair psychologists trying to "diagnose" Trump from the
sidelines, you have no idea what she really is. All you know is the persona
she plays for the cameras. We already know almost nothing about her
is what it seems. She's a rich kid, doesn't really have an economics
education, etc. She's tearing the Democrats apart every time she shows
her face on camera or on the floor of the House. She's playing a part in
a movie.
That may be part of it. I don't know for sure.
Look at the parallels to Trump, too. What we see on-screen is "The Donald."
This is a total act. Most people don't know what he's really like. Not at all.
But this crazy loon known more for "you're fired" than any of his life
accomplishments managed to beat out a field of 17 seasoned R candidates
and the billion dollar Clinton machine to win the Presidency. Then he
improved the economy, ended a nearly 70 year war, fixed trade with
nearly every country we deal with, and will likely mop up the entire ME
region before the end of his first term.
Similarly, AOC unseats the #2 House Democrat, to the point where
he not only doesn't show up for debates, he actually endorses her as a
candidate in the election. Now, suddenly, the left is beginning to call her
the leader of the new Democrat party. A couple years ago she was a
bartender. A nobody.
Underestimate this woman at your peril. She's either much, much smarter
than she appears, or she's playing a part in a movie. I'm torn.
Clearly you understand the problems with neither.
That could be true, and she's certainly much more entertaining - if her role
really is to divide the Dems, she's doing a better job than he could have
because he's old guard. There's a reason he let her take the seat.
Like I said, you have no idea what the problem is with either if you have
to ask that question. All collectivist systems fail for a single reason that
you clearly have not deduced. None of them have the ability to compensate
for changes in supply or demand. The mechanism that exists only in
a capitalist (free market) system does not exist when a benevolent government
is calling the shots. They are neither benevolent, nor capable of being
benevolent. This is no different than a minimum wage, resulting in a spiral
of increasing benefit costs that ultimately benefit nobody.
He's not whining, he clearly stated he thought it was strategic. 'mon anon, some of
you are so eager to find dissent, you see it in everything.
Fair 80's movie, bad 2012 remake.