baker, please consider the "global notables"

Specifically the one:

>>5007229 Attn newfags, this is a free speech board

Please read it, and read the related replies. Many calling it out as utter shill crap, as well as nominations made by shills.

Came to read notables after a long life fagging stint, and noticed this shilly "global notable".

It has nothing to do with free speech, plus the readme exist for a reason. The only reason why shills pushed it for global notables is for bad optics.