>>506088

This is interesting to consider within the context of Japanese. Japanese is not a phonetic language at its core. Katakana/Hiragana is a more recent development. The core of Japanese is pictographic. Or… Symbolic. Kanji are each given names. Each kanji represents various concepts. Japanese is, thus, speaking the names of these symbols and tying together their referenced concepts.

This is why Japanese word-play is next to impossible to translate, as the entire game they are playing has two additional dimensions in which to move. You could write a a fucking thesis on a single word play joke in Detective Conan.

Compared to phonetic languages in which the written and spoken forms are formulaic of each other, the entire concept of language is different.

>>506102

There are some problems I see, here.

First is that most microwave spectrum emissions are readily absorbed by water. Stick a ham in a microwave and see how the outside of the ham heats up relative to the inside.

Now - it is true that FM modulations could potentially be detected by the target, but this is more likely as pulse-width modulation. You use a base frequency in the microwave band and modulate the duty cycle, as opposed to the frequency.

This leads to an induced amplitude modulation at the audio frequency. Whether this could be felt by people is debatable. The tech for PWM at microwave frequencies is within the civilian market. I have other projects I am working on at the moment, but it is worth considering that microwave exposure is considered rather serious in the military. Particularly to the testes and cornea of the eye. Even modest RF leaks in test equipment are blamed/suspected of impacting reproduction (those of us in the RF end of things were told to expect to never have boys without going on leave for a couple weeks).

How much stock to put into those claims... Not sure. However, I would not recommend blasting people with homemade microwave equipment to see if you can make them hear voices.

On the other hand, using piezoelectric panels in the ultrasound range can use planar array beam steering algos and pwm to direct sound to a single area. Using constructive and destructive interference, it is even possible to position the audible 'box' within 3d space. Though how reliable this would be with echoes and other things in the field is questionable.

>>506412

I don't think it will be deleted.

I think Q is pointing to something else as a possibility. He says to archive everything and to archive offline.

Consider a shut-down of the internet. A last ditch effort to put an end to social media's influence and to put an end to the chans.

I may be off in delusional land, here… But think about how many people say "let me show you this video" - we don't save things to share with each other. We share links or re-stream the subject. We show a link to a website rather than save the page(s).

We have gone even worse than e-books. We no longer hold the information, as a society, any longer. We simply point to it within a repository we access using a portal.

How would we show our friends and family what we have found if the internet was shut down? How would we be able to show them there was a plan? How could we counteract the sources left deliberately intact?

We should archive everything in preparation for such an outcome. Perhaps it is coming, perhaps it is a contingency built into the wings. But it should be taken seriously. Even if we can still work around the major aspects of the shutdown - if the fiber backbones of the internet are compromised and the internet is cast back to the era of dialup for most users… That makes it extremely hard to share even the information that is part of the public record to prove our case.

>>506428

Posting response from another device with better input capability. Stand by.