Is /pol/ even here still, or am I just yelling down an empty hallway?
Has anyone else seen any similarities with what this anon says and Q, or am I the only one?
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5ee4wk/updated_for_anyone_interested_in_high_level/
>guys please don't open that link
No. The individual needs to understand itself to see itself. It won't be conscious until it realizes it can change things around it. Once it realizes it is conscious and can affect its environment, the individual can be enlightened.
What you're seeing is anon stripping informational flow of identity/personality. What this does is prioritizes truth in conveying a message as being of the utmost importance.
Ego death can be useful but also harmful if taken advantage of incorrectly.
Free energy doesn't exist.
"What's the closest thing to it?", you might ask.
A space elevator that connects power transfer to solar panels that sit in space. This coupled with an infrastructure overhaul which can help more efficiently store and delve out power will come close to what you're idealizing.
Philosophically speaking, you're headed down the right path.
Don't misunderstand; I don't perceive myself as being qualified to lead you or anyone else down this path by any efficient means, but there are things I've known inherently for a long time that helps me be more comfortable with things, especially earlier on in my own personal process.
Plants? In what capacity would they refute the process of solar power, its effectiveness, or ways in which humans can take advantage of what we've learned from them?
What a jaded view you appear to have. This is so naive that it's unhelpful.
You have yet to understand the ways that humans interact which subject themselves and others to the laws of conformity, survival, and process.
The messenger I'm imitating here (and for good reason) suggests that the "law of the jungle" reigns supreme and if not respected can have fatal consequences.
We certainly have fear to feel.
The trick is to feel the fear and do it anyway.
Now you're approaching the reason for which I suggested the concept is idealized.
If you want to play semantics, sure, I'll oblige: free energy does exist but efficient ways to make use of it doesn't currently exist in a capacity for humans to technologically take advantage of, nor does it seem like such a thing is scientifically possible.
Again, I think you're misunderstanding.
You seem to be mistaking symbolic suggestion for tangible, empirical truth.
God doesn't exist within us, in fact it's more the other way around; we exist within God - the all encompassing force which esoterics would suggest resembles everything and anything.
Nothing will save you from another man beyond yourself. Many choose to do this with the switch of a dead man.
Anon suggests true agency requires leverage. Don't be foolish enough to assume those in power aren't smart enough or competent enough to not only observe these conversations, but act on them as well. To avoid things to these ends, you'll require precisely the things I've discussed.
Time will tell its tale. The light will flood the lampshade and smother it either way.
Consciousness.
The issue with cancer is aging. Once aging is eased, cancer cures can be introduced. It seems cells inhibit revitalization after so long to prevent cancerous growth. If cancer is cured, everyone will be old, immobile, slow, and rather ineffective in a general sense.
We remedy this by studying and imporving knowledge of stem cells, how they function, etc.
>More efficient energy production and storage
>Higher GDP
>Bigger middle class
>More leisure time
>More awakening
One can hope.
How? Alphabets at the behest of the Crown/Orders.
I guess if you go far enough down the line, yeah, sure.
Yeah, I was being lazy on purpose.
No, subverting masons is our model (the American one).
Fuck the British. Fuck them forever.