>>6097592
> If you worry about him hogging too much of the conversation then feel free to post more about what interests you
No…like I said, I'm worried he's a SLIDE. It is a common shill tactic to steer the conversation away from any meaningful discussion. Either you spend the rest of your time talking with the slide or trying to prove the slide is a slide. Either way, their job is done.
>>6098897
>Why? Well, I’ve been a lurker in here from a very early period, and I haven’t seen any REAL DEEP research being done.
Sounds like a big ol' generalization to me and a slap in the face to anyone that has been researching on the chans. Blatantly disrespectful and dismissive. But you have all the answers right?
>I’m not here to follow blindly Potus or Q.
No one claimed you were. You seem to be actively working against them in my opinion.
>I believe it’s going to take something between 20 to 30 years for the world population to be TRULY awakened.
Another grand claim with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
>You LABEL yourself as profesional, but you are none of that.
What are you talking about? I literally just said, "This is just my opinion. I don't have any insider knowledge.". You're the one implying you have insider knowledge.
With claims like, "C.F. and Killary are the epicenter of everything. It is going to come out very soon, they are the boss of Epstein."
Whose pretending to be the professional knowledge holder again? Seems like a lot of projection to me.
>Profesionals don’t behave the way you did toward other people
How did I "behave" towards you? I've had limited interactions with you up until this point because slides are designed to make people ENGAGE them. Like I'm doing right now.
>I’ve always been a black sheep, I never belonged in a herd, I’m not about to change now. And I don’t want a herd following me.
OH of course, you don't want a herd following you but you namefag in every post you make. You know…just one of your general slide tactics. Quit victimizing yourself.