hi FomenkoAnon. Do you think that Q's 'Follow the wives' may reach the (Zacharias)Romanov overtake from Esther/Judith bible books?
Let me paste some links and extracts. Bear in mind those are automated translations from the russian language site.
A.T.Fomenko, G.V.Nosovskiy and their team put all their work for free in http://chronologia.org/bibliography.html
From HOW WAS in reality. Reconstruction of the universal history. (http://chronologia.org/kak_reconstruction/index.html). Chapter 6, section 5 (http://chronologia.org/kak_reconstruction/r06_01.html#r65):
>&& RUSSIAN VERSION.
>The Biblical Arta-Xerxes, aka Nebuchadnezzar, he is Ivan III the Terrible (allegedly 1462-1505) - is a partial reflection of Ivan IV the Terrible (1533-1547-1584) [6v1], ch.7-8. Ivan IV was born allegedly in 1530 (actually in 1526 [RI], ch.2, [ERIZ]) and was declared Grand Duke in 1533 [988: 00].
>The biblical Esther is Elena Voloshanka, wife of Ivan the Young, son of Ivan III = Ivan IV. The story of Elena Voloshanka in the Romanov version is shifted to the XV century. In fact, the events took place in the second half of the XVI century. Helen was really a foreigner who came to Moscow from the south. "In 1482, the heir Ivan Ivanovich married the daughter of the Moldavian ruler Elena Voloshanka" [778], p.115. In strict accordance with the Bible, she was a Jew and belonged to the heresy of the Judaizers, who at that time was secret in Russia [690], p.10-12. Reportedly, "from the outside, heresy supporters remained Orthodox Christians and preserved external piety. Before the people … they were strict adherents of Orthodoxy, they denounced and cursed false teachings. In secret, they committed their evil actions" [690], p.9-10.
>So, Esther is Moldavian Princess Elena Voloshanka, that is Moldavanka. And her father, the Moldavian Khan, is the biblical Mordecai.
>Alexander V. Kartashov, a church history specialist, reports: ^^ In the year 1470, the heresy of the so-called "Jews" appeared in Novgorod in 1470. Her vaccination is brought in from the outside … Novgorodians … invited to Kiev … Prince of Kiev Alexander (according to other news, he was a Lithuanian prince [690], p.9 - Auth.) … The prince arrived in Novgorod … with assistants who brought here ideological novelties from the West … New items not from the Christian West, but from Western Jewry. In the retinue of the prince was his Liebmedic Jew Shariya ^^ [372], v.1, p.489. For a year some of the circle of higher Novgorod clergy joined the heresy. Heretics were sometimes called Skharians by the name of Sharii (Zechariah).
>And further: ^^ RELATED, PROFESSIONALLY FAMILY nature of sectarianism strikes the eye … The whole matter was fundamentally set up as a secret conspiracy … For ten years the sect managed to preserve its CORPORATIVE LIFE … At the end of 1479 the conqueror of Novgorod Ivan III himself arrived there and was fascinated by the talents and courtesy of cunning protopopic free-thinkers. He decided to transfer them to his capital. He made Aleksey the proto-priest of the Assumption Cathedral, and Denis the Archangel. It is necessary to think that this honorable translation … was prompted by the secret union of the Judaizers themselves, whose Moscow branch was started up under Ivan the III YARD and headed by MINISTER of FOREIGN AFFAIRS, the clerk of the Posolsky Prikaz, Fyodor Vasilyevich Kuritsyn … Everything was completely covered 1487, when conspiracy failed in Novgorod ^^ [372], v.1, p.490-491.
>Ostensibly in 1487 (in fact, a century later), the Novgorod archbishop Gennady discovers the heresy of the Judaizers and begins its persecution. In Novgorod, that is, in Yaroslavl, heresy was destroyed. However, in Moscow, the heretics were not touched, since they constituted the NEAR ENVIRONMENT OF KING IVAN III. Nevertheless, Gennady and other hierarchs of the Russian church insist on persecution: "Execute heretics - burn and hang!" [690], p.13.
>Ostensibly for 1490, a cathedral was appointed against heretics. Above them threatened complete defeat. But Ivan III's daughter-in-law, the wife of his son Ivan the Young, Elena Voloshanka, is already among them. Or she was a heretic from the beginning. The wedding of Ivan the Young and Elena Moldavanka took place allegedly in 1482 or 1483 [778], p.115, [282], p.54. Soon, - from the moment of the birth of Dmitry's son at Elena Moldavanka, - a family scandal erupted in the family of Ivan III, in the center of which are Sofia Paleolog, the wife of Ivan III, and young daughter-in-law Elena. Ivan III quarrels with Sophia Paleolog.
>In March, allegedly in 1490, Ivan Young unexpectedly dies. Some thought he was poisoned. The doctor who was treating was executed.
>The quarrel between Elena Moldavanka and Ivan III's wife, Sophia Paleolog, flares up even more. The conflict between Ivan III and Sophia takes on open forms. The king removes his wife and frankly APPROACHES ELENA - a young widow, the wife of a deceased son. She enters into full confidence in Ivan III. This is the biblical story of Esther.
>There are two opposing camps. One is Sophia Palaeologus with her son Vasily. The other is Elena Moldavanka with her son Dmitri. Both boys are possible heirs to the throne. On the side of the first camp stands the Russian Orthodox Church, Joseph Volotsky, Archbishop Gennady. Behind the second camp is the heresy of the Jew.
>And here Tsar Ivan III for a long time gives preference to the second camp, actually supports the heresy of the Judaizers. The threat of defeating heresy disappears. In the same alleged year of 1490, the liquidating heretic Zosima [372], vol. 1, p. 495, became the metropolitan of Moscow. The heretics Dionysius and Alexy were taken by the tsar to the priestly ministry in the Moscow Kremlin: Alexy - the priest in the Assumption Cathedral, and Dionysius - the priest in the Archangel.
>Novgorod Archbishop Gennady and other hierarchs of the Russian church seek a church council to destroy heresy in Moscow. The cathedral allegedly takes place in 1490, but DOESN'T TAKE ANY DECISIONS AGAINST ERERTISTS. The culmination of the heresy of the Judaizers is the culmination of the imprisonment of Basil, son of Ivan III, the cruel execution of those close to Basil and supporters of Queen Sophia. They were drowned in the Moscow River. Sophia Paleologue runs to Beloozero. Elena Voloshanka triumphs. Supposedly in 1498, still under live Ivan III, her son Dmitri was magnificently crowned with a kingdom. He becomes co-regent with Ivan III. This is where the book of Esther's Old Testament ends its story.
From BIBLICAL RUSSIA (http://chronologia.org/seven6_1/index.html). Chapter 7, section 21 (http://chronologia.org/seven6_1/bibrus07_21.html):
>21. THE END OF THE OTHRIANS AND THE DISCHARGE OF THE ZAKHARYAINS IN THE XVI CENTURY. WHY THE ROMANIANS DISTORTED THE RUSSIAN HISTORY IN THE XVII CENTURY.
>It is known that the oprichnina, during which the terror of Purim was launched, ends with the famous Moscow defeat of 1572. At this time, the very oprichnina is being trashed. As the documents show, it was, in fact, the defeat of the clan Zakharyins. From which, later - and soon - the Romanovs will come out. During the Moscow case, numerous Zakharyins were executed or expelled: the boyar Yakovlev-ZAKHARYIN, relatives of the deceased boyar Yuriev-ZAKHARYIN, the boyar Chiron-ZAKHARYIN. Please note that the word ZAKHARIN is a kind of prefix for various surnames. But then, in the light of what we already know, the question arises. Are not these ZAHARJINS the very SHIRE students, the disciples of Sharii? That is, Judaicans, defeated allegedly in the years 1499-1504, with repentant Ivan III the Terrible. After all, ZAKHARY and CHARIA (Heb. ZHRIH or ZKRIKH) are the same name! Slightly differently spoken. Our guess is indirectly confirmed by the following bright bar. It turns out that in the 16th century, Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible, ordering the killing of the relatives of the deceased Yuryev-Zakharyin, "DID NOT ALLOW TO BURY THEIR BODY UNDER THE CHRISTIAN CUSTOM" [776], p. What's the matter? After all, the Orthodox Tsar is obliged to bury in a Christian manner any Orthodox. Even if his worst enemy. And here - an unexpected ban!
>Before us is a bright sign of religious unrest. The behavior of the king becomes clear if the pastors were ERECTORS. The Orthodox Tsar could not bury the heretics in a Christian manner. But it brings even closer the Zakharyins of the XVI century and the Sharievtsy = Jews of the XV century. Moreover, the Zakharyins' defeat comes at the very end of the oprichnina. That fully corresponds to the history of the Judaizers under Ivan III the Terrible, ostensibly in the XV century. In both cases: the seizure of power by relatives or co-religionists of the wife, ten years of celebration, then defeat, which has the character of a struggle against religious heresy.
>Our conclusion is as follows. The future Romanovs left the clan of heretics Zakharyin-Sharievtsev. His reflection, deliberately relegated to 70-80 years down, in the XV century, is the well-known secret society of the Judaizers in Russia. The idea of such a shift of the heresy of the Jew in the past is understandable. The Romanovs cleaned out of Russian history both the traces of their participation in the oprichnich terror, and their direct connection with the official cursed heresy of the fluid. The memory of heresy has remained until now. The ecclesiastical anathema of the Judaizers also remained in force, at least until the 18th century [690], p.17. But to the Romanovs and to the Zakharins it was allegedly not applicable. Because in the “Romanov history textbook” written by them themselves, the heresy of the Judaizers and the Zakharyins divides the 70- or 80-year gap artificially created by them. And, the main motive was an attempt to hide participation in heresy, and not in terror. Participation in terror in itself would not cause doubts in their power. After all, you can always say: our good ancestors smashed bad people, enemies. But participation in the official cursed religious heresy is a much more dangerous accusation for the new dynasty.
I would too recommend to read DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICA BY RUSSIA-HORDE http://chronologia.org/seven6_2/index.html
My bad! I just noticed they have that first text translated to english in http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/index.html
and http://chronologia.org/en/nch6_1_bible_rus/index.html