>>5416012

I've mentioned this before:

From Julian Assange twitter account on October 15 2017:

"There is something wrong with Hillary Clinton. It is not just her constant lying. It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement. Watch closely. Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVCHU4wCBQg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n8pHWAbwy0

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-jr-hillary-clinton-birthday-attack-tweet-arrogant-entitled-a8022306.html

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/23/spike-lee-hillary-clinton-thought-she-was-entitled/

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-hillarys-what-happened-needs-a-better-name-how-about-i-was-entitled

>>5416012

>>5416479

Presenting piece number 14 in my case on Killary =" Let them eat cake". Killary & Chelsea SAME & EXACT Marie- Antoinette moment. Those words are not the slip of the tongue. For someone whom's every action, wardrobe, every word, every gesture is planned in advance, those comments taken from Marie-Antoinette are not a slip of the tongue nor a coincidence. There arguments if the words were TRULY said by Marie-Antoinett, but that isn't important, because it's more like a figurative way to talk than a direct message. This a reference to how indiferent the beheaded queen was to the suffering of her people, regardless if those were truly her words or not. It points out how French monarchy was senseless and selfish, ignoring the hunger and suffering of their "citoyens"

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2014/06/how-did-hillary-clinton-become-marie-antoinette.html

http://sonorannews.com/2016/10/04/hillarys-marie-antoinette-moment-nafta-put-trump-top/

"“That’s your opinion.”

That was Hillary Clinton’s Sept. 26 debate response to Donald Trump’s contention that “Your husband signed NAFTA, which was one of the worst things that ever happened to the manufacturing industry.”

"That is why Clinton’s dismissive remark was perhaps her biggest gaffe of the presidential election campaign so far, particularly when one takes a close look at the electoral map. She could have at least acknowledged the losses and the possibility that the trade deals played a role. Instead she dismissed the concern with hand waving akin to Marie Antoinette’s supposed saying, “Let them eat cake.” Very risky. The one thing she cannot afford to lose are any more union households that traditionally vote Democrat in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan, who are greatly concerned by the economic decline the U.S. is experiencing.

Again, not opinion. The economic slowdown is real."

https://chrishanger.wordpress.com/2016/11/10/marie-antoinette-clinton/

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/keith-rupp/2014/06/25/hillary-clinton-channels-marie-antoinette-on-personal-wealth

https://flaglerlive.com/90483/hillary-clinton-marie-antoinette/

>>5417046

And here is a little mix of all the "stars" that simply love Marie-Antoinette. I bet ya it's all a coincidence. Re-read my drops on Madonna if anons cannot see the connection.

https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/423189/Madonna-hosts-Marie-Antoinette-themed-birthday-bash

>>5415045

Forgot this picture with earlier drop

>>5420618

Good to see you Fomenko Anon,

It's true that you and I don't see eye to eye when it comes to Fomenko, but it sure is good to see you here.

The bibliographie out there about inscriptions is huge. I've just told you the 2 I remember of cause everything else is back at home. But you don't need me to dig them up, you can find any INSCRIPTION or epigraphy as in a text written on hard material like clay tablettes or stone heads. You can find them all for sure in the Library of Congress, the "bibliothèque nationale de France" and other big places like that. What is good about those texts are they are not capable of faking them. The grammar in them is a killer. One day, I hope I can take you along with me and show you the tables of Mari and Ebla, it's going to blow your mind away.

And just for the fun of things, let me tell you about a little story. Remember how I told you once my mentor and teacher is expert in greek and latin languages. Well, he has a friend expert in CUNEIFORM (old MESOPOTAMIAN writting system - sorry, I forgot it's name in english now). So one day, we got a call from that friend of his invinting us to spedn the day at the universoty lab and restoration room where he worked. We went there, thinking he made some huge new discovery. It turned out he was working on a tablette that came from the library of a palace and it was a food recipe.

So guess what us old folks did next? ^_^ we tried the recipe as written on the tablette. And it turned out to be a salad terribly similar to the LEBANESE Tabbuleh or Tabbouléh….. apart the tomatoes they added to it nowadays. It was one of the best and funnest days of my life. I've eaten a dish that is thousands of years old.

As for Fomenko, I've found 2 opposite paths for his work. One if a good path, as in along side the Aliance. And the other is a bad path, along side the Cabal. It's just theories for now. But I've been trying to check with "others" whom I know. I've been getting contradictory answers.

And by the way, I've showed the pictures of the Richat structure = the eye of Mauritania to 2 geologist whom I trust. And they were bewildered at first and they confirmed this being a blast; not a volcano exploding nor a meteor crash. I think I red pilled them with just showing them the pictures.

My best advice to you is what I told you before. Let the object on the ground verify if your text is real or not. No matter what the text is, even if it's the Bible. Do you get me anon? This way you have solid proof and no one on earth can argue with you. Don't take the text and try to find clues on the ground. Work the other way around. Look at the clues on the ground and see if it matches whatever text you are holding in your hand. You will do great stuff if you follow this method. Good luck!

>>5399341

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon%27s_Eye_(symbol)

"The Dragon's Eye is an ancient Germanic symbol, according to Rudolf Koch.[1] The Dragon's Eye is an isosceles or equilateral triangle pointing downward, with a "Y" in the middle connecting the three points of the triangle together. According to Carl G. Liungman's Dictionary of Symbols, it combines the triangle meaning "threat" and the "Y" meaning a choice between good and evil.

The dragon's eye is used by the White Nationalist organization Identity Evropa"

This is Thomas anon. I'm gonna try to drop this in the general thread and see what I get.

>>5424331

Actually epigraphy and inscriptions aren't dated back from the written paper texts. Some are, but not all. Linguist, mostly ancient language study really heavily on the grammar and the evolution of the letterrs in the alphabet or the pictograms used. Just go take a look at the evolution of the Phoenician alphabet and how it differes from one region to another and in one area to another. that is one example. For an ordinary person, even for me whom isn't used to the texts, the eye cannot catch the difference and certainly not the grammar. But for the ones whom read and decifer texts like these on daily basis they can quickly catch it.

I was still quiet young and i was having lunch with my old mentor and teacher. Someone came rushing towards us like crazy in the cafeteria and that person was out of breath. He asked my teacher to abandon the afternoon classes and to go with him in order to see an newly discovered big find. My teacher said no. After a bit of insisting and arguments, my teacher agreed he would see pictures of the artifact but he won't leave campus ground. So that guy rushed back, and after a few hours came back with some other people and they brought the artifact with them. It was a small piece of chess pawn, that had an inscription on it (i'm not going to give more details about it). After barely a glance, my teache threw it in the garbage can in front of everyone. Just imagine everyone's horror. And he simply said: it's a fake. The owners rushed to pick it up and called my teacher names and said he was one big failure and they left. As for us the students we urged the teacher to tell us why he acted the way he did. He said it's because it really was a fake piece, a falsified artifact. When asked how he found out about it, he said that he only read the inscription and the grammar was not that of the language written on the artifact, it's a forgery.

a few months passed and while being in class our teacher got a phone call. After hanging up he told us that call came from the owners of that chess piece. They took it to carbon dating, it turned out to be a false piece dating back barely a decade ago and not older as everyone thought it was. It was one big forgery and since the one doing the forgery doesn't understand how the language is written he simply copied randomly a few words.

Do you see what I mean?

As for Fomenko being cabal or not. That has been puzzeling me as well. So i guess it's up to you to solve this riddle about how authentic Fomenko as a person is by digging about him. If you have been reading my drops, you know i don't leave a stone i don't turn. Go check him out, his family, his wife, his kids, his neighbors, his friends, where he works, who funded his work, where he used to hang out, what sort of studies he made, who published his work, who sponsored it, who are his connections. If you can follow the money, as in who was supporting his research. And if you smell just a hint of cabal smell, don't over look it, the alarm bells in your head must ring out loud and you should be even more careful while digging about him.

Good luck

This is Thomas anon again,

Presenting piece number 15 about my case on P = C = Clinton.

This is a hard piece anons, it's a tricky one. First take a look at the date. Then you must be really good at reading between the lines.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3656262/Marie-Antoinette-and-me.html

"After the execution of her husband, she had fought to save her children only to have them all taken from her and then, to see, nightmarishly, her brainwashed eight-year-old son publicly and enthusiastically testify that she had indulged in unnatural sexual practices with him.

Her Austrian royal relatives abandoned her. Still, she never flinched during those final four years in hell.

Ordinary people who rise to testing times with great courage are not unknown but they are rare. On a more prosaic level, many women in the public eye find themselves suddenly mired in humiliating and difficult situations and make something admirable out of their pain.

Katharine Graham was facing abandonment by the disturbed husband she loved when he committed suicide. She overcame her own inexperience to run his newspaper empire (Newsweek, The Washington Post and television stations) with tremendous success.

Jacqueline Kennedy endured the assassination of her husband and the media vilification of her marriage to Ari Onassis to become an accomplished book editor and devoted mother, brave in her own premature death.

Hillary Clinton was never a slacker, always ambitious, but it takes something to turn your husband's public betrayal into the platform to launch your own spectacular political career.

Diane von Furstenberg rose like a comet and lived on glossy-magazine covers as one half of a Marie Antoinette socialite couple, spoiled for parties and fun."

I just put that extract just in case the article magically "vanishes".

Now again look at the date:

12:01AM BST 25 Oct 2006

Now look at the names of the modern day women mentioned in the article? What are the odds of those ladies being memberrs of the red shoe clan? What are the odds of them landing in an article along side pedophilia, insest and Marie-Antoinette?

Did a tiny bit of digging, ever since Nancy Reagan, all the first ladies had some sort of "articles linking" them to Marie-Antoinette, including Melania Trump but we know Flotus to use the symbolism of the Cabal to send messages, don't we anon? She has done it over and over again. So I think Melania and Potus know the link to Marie-Antoinette.

And i tried to see if the former first ladies (I've started with Nancy Reagan) can be linked in any way or any article to Empress Eugenie wife of Napoleon III or to Josephine wife of Napoleon I Bonaparte. The answer is NO. The focus is only on Marie-Antoinette .

>>5425679

sorry anon, I didn't understand the first words of your message. Thank you for the information about Alice. I still didn't have time to check about Jared Kushner building. And I was just wondering, the Standard hotel, what is it really about? Are there tunnels there? Can the Biltmore hotel chain be just like the Standard hotel was used for pedophilia? i mean, is there more to it all?

Presenting piece number 16 about my case on P = C = Clinton.

Now anons, here your help is much needed, for those whom have been reading my drops, please do tell me what you think.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chelsea-clinton-george-soros-nephew/

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?2768633-Chelsea-Clinton-s-husband-is-a-nephew-of-George-Soros

https://www.vox.com/2018/5/29/17404972/roseanne-clinton-conspiracy-trump

"On Tuesday morning, Roseanne Barr went on a Twitter tirade against liberals, invoking conspiracy theories, lobbing a bizarre slur at Barack Obama’s top adviser Valerie Jarrett, and weirdly claiming Chelsea Clinton is married to a Soros.

So continues the political journey of the television star, whose eponymous ABC show was renewed for a second season after just one episode, and who is also one of the biggest promoters of online far-right conspiracy theories — and a vocal supporter of President Trump. Earlier this year, Trump even called Barr to congratulate her on her show’s success and thank her for her support.

First, Barr accused Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of former President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, of being married to a nephew of billionaire philanthropist George Soros."

Now anons, here is where your help is needed = please answer honestly this question: Who do you believe and trust more, Roseanne Barr or the MSM + Chelsea Clinton ?

Roseanne gets my vote. How about you anons?

See how vehement Chelsea's reply is? Roseanne hit it in the bullseye. That was one very sensitive nerve she hit.

So anons, can you see how Soros was catapulted from the bottom of the pyramid to the top seat : Soros = +; instead of Rockefellers?

>>5425928

^_^ Your instinct is right anon.

I've been reading a lot for decades. I have a lot in my head. And I know a lot. I have been facing the difficulty of finding stuff on the internet to present to you anons as proof of what I know mostly because it seems the internet was "scrubbed clean" from a lot of articles, writtings and pictures i've read before.

I have come to believe that Napoleon Bonaparte I and his "dynastie" was the creation of Payseur in response to the French Revolution.

For me, it goes this way:

• American independance war Bourbons helping americans made the Windsors loose. (red shoe clan members)

• Windsors (their ancestors) retaliated by causing the French revolution. Just take a long look at the symbolism and masonic ties of the revolutioneers and mostly Robespierre . But the revolution got out of hand; it's why there is a saying in French about this : " la révolution dévore ses enfants" = the revoltion devours it's own children. Creepy isn't it? (black eye clan members)

• When the republic came to France and Payseur fled to the States, he retaliated by creating Napoleon Bonaparte I. (red shoe clan members)

• Napoleon was defeated by english-german (prusian) alliance mostly (black eye clan members)

• WWI was ignited by Black eye members in order to take over Europe and rule it, eliminating in the process the remaining "cousins" of the red shoe clan, as in the Tsar of Russia and the Austro-Hungarian empire. But that failed.

• WWII was again ignited by Black eye clan members for the same goal as WWI. Red shoe clan fought back with creating the Alliance.

Now this is just a draft anon, it's just the main lines in my head. I'm neglecting this matter for now because i want Payseur heir's identity first. I have later on all the time in the world to research and check out if my draft is correct or not and what details I should work on. But this is what I have gathered in my head from all of those years of reading.

>>5426164

Holy Heavens anon! Now this is HUGE.

Do tell me how am I supposed to go to work and concetrate on working after reading this?

Pervez Musharraf is one big member of the cabal. The Pakistani intelligence has worked for decades hand in hand with mostly the Mossade, the MI6, the black CIA and the UAE and KSA intelligence units. Most of the time, those agencies use the Pakistani intelligence members to do the field work instead of them.

And KSA always donates HUGE to Pakistan where they sponsored a lot of "religious" schools, mosques, and I believe they encourage extremism as in Wahhabism. You can check that out online, there is plenty info about it. Follow the money. And I would like to point out that according to Q, KSA was bloody wonderland. And don't be surprised if you find a path leading you straight to Epstein Island. I keep on saying it, but no one believes me, Clintons are the boss of Epstein. They are not simple visitors there. And Clintons are the true head of NXIVM. Mossad is heavily involved as well, they work hand in hand with Clintons.

How do you think the Clintons and the Mossad have such an "influence" over the us congressmen and senate?

So now, we can link Payseur to Killary directly. Can this be added (with your approval) to the case I'm present as in P = C = Clinton? Can I tie this to the case on Killary as piece 17.

Now my nose is telling me there is something fishy about the Phoenix Arizone hotel, mostly because of those revolving doors and secret rooms and such stuff. I also suspect the one in Los Angeles where they shot all of those music videos in as well as both hotels in Florida and the one in Rhodes Island. is there a way we can find "clues" about those hotels, as you did about the Roosvelt one?