This is Thomas Anon,

Continuing my dig on Fontainebleau. Sorry if I was late, had a busy day, eventhough it's a sunday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Fontainebleau

"The Edict of Fontainebleau (22 October 1685) was an edict issued by Louis XIV of France, also known as the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. The Edict of Nantes (1598) had granted the Huguenots the right to practice their religion without persecution from the state. Though Protestants had lost their independence in places of refuge under Richelieu on account of their supposed insubordination, they continued to live in comparative security and political contentment. From the outset, religious toleration in France had been a royal, rather than a popular policy.[1] The lack of universal adherence to his religion did not sit well with Louis XIV's vision of perfected autocracy: "Bending all else to his will, Louis XIV resented the presence of heretics among his subjects."[attribution needed][2] "

>>> For the anons whom are interested to read more, mostly to see how the Cabal has operated long ago to plant division discord between the people, here is a good example. Remember what Q always say: they want us divided. They wants us weak, etc. This Edit is a good example of how they used to do it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Fontainebleau_(1762)

"The Treaty of Fontainebleau was a secret agreement of 1762 in which France ceded Louisiana to Spain. The treaty followed the last battle in the French and Indian War in North America, the Battle of Signal Hill in September 1762, which confirmed British control of Canada. In Europe, the associated Seven Years' War continued to rage. Having lost Canada, King Louis XV of France proposed to King Charles III of Spain that France should give Spain "the country known as Louisiana, as well as New Orleans and the island in which the city is situated."[1] Charles accepted on November 13, 1762.

This agreement covered all of Louisiana: the entire valley of the Mississippi River, from the Appalachians to the Rockies. The Treaty of Fontainebleau was kept secret even during the French negotiation and signing of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the war with Britain.

The Treaty of Paris, made between France and Great Britain following the Seven Years' War, divided Louisiana at the Mississippi. The eastern half was ceded to Britain, and the western half and New Orleans were nominally retained by France. Spain did not contest Britain's control of eastern Louisiana, as it already knew that it would rule in western Louisiana. Also, under the Treaty of Paris, Spain had ceded Florida to Britain for which western Louisiana was its compensation.

The Treaty of Paris provided a period of 18 months in which French colonists who did not want to live under British rule could freely emigrate to other French colonies. Many of the emigrants moved to Louisiana, where they discovered later that France had ceded Louisiana to Spain.

The cession to Spain was finally revealed in 1764. In a letter dated April 21, 1764, Louis informed the governor, Jean-Jacques Blaise d'Abbadie, of the transition:

Hoping, moreover, that His Catholic Majesty will be pleased to give his subjects of Louisiana the marks of protection and good will which only the misfortunes of war have prevented from being more effectual.

The colonists in western Louisiana did not accept the transition and expelled the first Spanish governor in the Rebellion of 1768. Alejandro O'Reilly, an Irish émigré, suppressed the rebellion and formally raised the Spanish flag in 1769.

The acquisition of Louisiana consolidated the Spanish Empire in North America. When Great Britain returned Florida to Spain in 1783, after the American Revolutionary War, Spanish territory completely encircled the Gulf of Mexico and stretched from Florida west to the Pacific Ocean, and north to Canada west of the Mississippi River. "

>>> Anons shouldn't forget there are 3 branches of the bourbons family = 1 - French - 2 - Spanish - 3 - Luxemburg. So as I've said it before, the ball = Louisiana "country", was tossed from the right hand to the left hand. In reality, nothing changed, the owner is still the same.

>>5489387

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Paris_(1763)

"The Treaty of Paris, also known as the Treaty of 1763, was signed on 10 February 1763 by the kingdoms of Great Britain, France and Spain, with Portugal in agreement, after Great Britain's victory over France and Spain during the Seven Years' War.

The signing of the treaty formally ended the Seven Years' War, known as the French and Indian War in the North American theatre,[1] and marked the beginning of an era of British dominance outside Europe.[2] Great Britain and France each returned much of the territory that they had captured during the war, but Great Britain gained much of France's possessions in North America. Additionally, Great Britain agreed to protect Roman Catholicism in the New World. The treaty did not involve Prussia and Austria as they signed a separate agreement, the Treaty of Hubertusburg, five days later. "

>>> I like this treaty along with it's map because it gives us a very good visual and idea what Bourbons consider as their "empire" and what the Windsors (back then their ancestors) consider as theirs as well. Nowadays, do those same territories fall under the hegemony of the same players? It would be interesting to find that one out.

I would also like to point out that the Chateau de Fontainebleau has a lot of Artemis = Diana goddess statues and wall decorations insside and outside. I gues this is mostly because Artémis was the goddess of wild life and hunting. But in the same time it disturb me a bit because in Antiquity there were a LOT of "virgin sacrifices" related to the worship of Artémis; the godddess always has thing ruthlessness about her and her worship. And the armenian goddess Anahid is Artémis equivalent in Armenia.

>>5489735

And the last I looked into was the Fontainebleau hotel in Miami Florida:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fontainebleau_Miami_Beach

"The Fontainebleau Miami Beach (also known as Fontainebleau Hotel) is a hotel in Miami Beach, Florida. Opened in 1954 and designed by Morris Lapidus, it was arguably the most luxurious hotel in Miami Beach, and is thought to be the most significant building of Lapidus's career. In 2007, the Fontainebleau Hotel was ranked ninety-third in the American Institute of Architects list of "America's Favorite Architecture".[2] On April 18, 2012, the AIA's Florida Chapter ranked the Fontainebleau first on its list of Florida Architecture: 100 Years. 100 Places.[3]

The Fontainebleau Miami Beach is situated on oceanfront Collins Avenue in the heart of Millionaire's Row and is currently owned by Fontainebleau Resorts. Fronting the Atlantic Ocean, the 1,504-room resort features two new towers, 12 restaurants and bars. a 40,000-square-foot (3,700 m2) spa with mineral-rich water therapies, swimming pools and an oceanfront poolscape featuring a free-form pool shaped as a re-interpretation of Lapidus’ signature bow-tie design. "

"Lapidus once wrote, "If you create a stage and it is grand, everyone who enters will play their part." The hotel was built by hotelier Ben Novack on the Harvey Firestone estate. Novack owned and operated the hotel until its bankruptcy in 1977.[4]

The Fontainebleau is famous for its victory in the landmark 1959 Florida District Courts of Appeal decision, Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc. 114 So. 2d 357,[5] in which the Fontainebleau Hotel successfully appealed an injunction by the neighboring Eden Roc Hotel, to prevent construction of an expansion that blocked sunlight to the Eden Roc's swimming pool. The Court rejected the Eden Roc's claim to an easement allowing sunlight, in favor of affirming the Fontainebleau's vertical property rights to build on its land.[6][7] It stated that the "ancient lights" doctrine has been unanimously repudiated in the United States.[8]

In the 1970s a suite in the hotel was used by members of the Black Tuna Gang to run their operations.[9] This is recounted in the 2011 documentary Square Grouper, which follows the burgeoning marijuana-smuggling trade of the mid-to-late 1970s. It was at this time that large amounts of the drug were being shipped to southeastern Florida; the film alleges that more than ninety percent of the United States's illicit demand was being met through such channels.

In 1978, Stephen Muss bought the Fontainebleau Hotel for $27 million[10] rescuing it from bankruptcy.[11] He injected an additional $100 million into the hotel for improvements[11] and hired the Hilton company to manage it.[10] In 2005, the Muss Organization sold the Fontainebleau to Turnberry Associates[12] for $165 million.[10]

The hotel closed a large part of its property in 2006, though one building remained open to hotel guests, and the furnishings were available for sale. The expanded hotel and its new condominium buildings re-opened in November 2008.[13]

On December 22, 2008, the Fontainebleau was added to the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.[1]"

>>> Very nice place. Did I missunderstood anons? Was there some drug trafficking taking place from a suite inside this hotel? And I found the location of the hotel very peculiar if you compare it to Broward and Palm Beach counties, where a lot of corruption is. And I find it's well located when it comes to Little St James Island. And anons shouldn't forget that Jeffrey Epstein has a home in Palm Beach as well, everyone talks about the island, but everyone forgets about his home in Palm Beach. I'm not implying anything nor suggesting anything. These are simple observations made by an old man. Nothing more to it. It may show up later on in another search, or it may help another anon figure out something.

>>5415483

About a week ago, I've posted about Bourbon Jewelry and i mentioned Killary wearing a ruby necklace at the Al Smith dinner. I was surprised to see Q bring that dinner up, yesterday, if i'm not mistaken and he added at the end of his post that "symbolism will be their downfall". So I decided to take another look at this specific dinner and I checked out about the meaning of Rubies since Killary was wearing a ruby necklace.

https://www.gemsociety.org/article/history-legend-rubies-gems-yore/

"A Stone of Kings

Many cultures have long considered ruby a stone of kings. Not surprisingly, ruby symbolism and lore have many associations with power, wealth, and their protection. Possessing a ruby purportedly benefited and protected the owner’s estates and assisted in the accumulation of wealth. Notably, this gem would help its owner acquire more gems.

When worn as a talisman, ruby’s mystical properties extended to personal protection. People believed wearing the stone on the left, the heart side, would allow the bearers to live peacefully. None could take their land or rank. The blood-colored stone would preserve them from all perils, even their homes from storms."

Anons can read the rest of the article in the link I provided, it's a good read.

So the ruby symbolizes wealth, power and is considered as a talisman for personal protection….. not to forget it was also considered the GEM OF KINGS.

(rolling eyes) just great! What message was Killary trying to send by wearing that necklace? We all know she is highly into symbolism, so she must have known in advance the meaning of rubies and she planned wearing it at the event.

https://www.jewelsforme.com/ruby-meaning

And this article kinda surprised me how it gemstone to the ruby slippers in the wizard of Oz. I mean why put the 2 in the same article? That's a gemstone, and the other is in a movie, couldn't they talk about the mineral composition of the gemstone?

>>5491721

I also found this:

https://www.gemsociety.org/article/history-legend-rubies-gems-yore/

"The Inner Light of Rubies

Ruby’s inner glow seems to hint that perhaps it contains an inner fire. This visual effect may have inspired some curious bits of lore. A ruby placed in water could bring it to a boil. If hidden in a wrapping, the gem could shine through and reveal its presence.

Stories are told of rubies that emit their own light. One was even described as “shining like a torch.”

Now this got me laughing till my eyes were filled with tears anons. Killary wears a ruby necklace = is she trying to say she emit her own light? She is the torch that guide lost travelers? And then, I find a picture of hers wearing a pendant that goes by : I am light.

LOL!!!! I cannot stop laughing anons. How sick is she?

On this I'm going to wish anons a goodnight. Before I go, I want to try and post this in the general thread to see if I can get something, but I doubt it. Gosh! This one is funny. Wishing anons a good evening. WWG1WGA.