Anonymous ID: 89c73b Feb. 7, 2019, 7:58 p.m. No.5074321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4410 >>4417 >>4432 >>4452 >>4466 >>4471 >>4481 >>4509 >>4512 >>4562 >>4565 >>4620 >>4631 >>4668 >>4830 >>4838 >>4914

LA CHOPPER DIG

 

In the video I will link here, 11 men can clearly be counted leaving from a building at 1150 Wilshire Blvd.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=162&v=xF2yfBPQtVQ

 

Follow along the pictures for my deductions. Two of the men are carrying a box of some kind. There are 4-5 choppers in the vid, so it is possible one of them landed in front of Wells Fargo. 1150 Wilshire is this weird looking building with the roll up door.

 

More digging is required, but Google maps has it belonging to "Global Lighting Organization", which looks to be an importer of Chinese LED tubes.

 

Incidentally, neither LAPD nor SWAT have Blackhawk helicopters, and these ARE Blackhawk helicopters. These have the refueling probe attached, clearly visible. Blackhawks can carry 11 men, unlike LAPD choppers.

Anonymous ID: 89c73b Feb. 7, 2019, 8:14 p.m. No.5074509   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5074321

Looking closer at the vid, I think they ran out of 1138 Wilshire, not 1150. Difficult to tell. A 'Guatemalan Trade Center' non profit is registered there.

Anonymous ID: 89c73b Feb. 7, 2019, 8:50 p.m. No.5074962   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CHINA NERVOUS?

 

https://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/2184615/why-chinas-military-messages-us-are-toothless-and-america-seems-know

 

There are couple of articles like this on floating around SCMP. Surprising, because lately Hong Kong has been very muted in its criticism of Beijing's policies. I can't decide if they are just being brazen, or if this is Beijing's attempt to lower expectations regarding their military capabilities. To me it feels like #2.

 

"The report on CCTV demonstrating for the first time that China fired its next generation intermediate range ballistic missile, the Dongfeng-26, prompted many experts quoted by the Post to claim this as yet another deliberate message from the People’s Liberation Army to the US that China “can hit moving targets like ships” (“Missile footage sends messages to US, analysts say,” January 29).

Observant readers in and outside China may be excused for wondering why messages repeated over decades, parading multiple, supposed game-changers against mobile targets like aircraft carriers and long-range bombers – from “Sunburn” supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles aboard Sovremennye-class destroyers, “Black Hole” Kilos-class submarines and Sukhoi-35 fighter jets imported from Russia to indigenous anti-ship ballistic missiles, from the earlier generation DF-21 to the current DF-26 – all failed to deter annoying US naval vessels and strategic B-52 bombers from conducting frequent freedom of navigation operations in China’s proclaimed territorial seas, skies and exclusive economic zones, or transiting sensitive waters like the Taiwan Strait.

The quoted commentators, intentionally or not, never informed readers what Pentagon is aware of: China never realistically tested any of these “killer maces” (as Chinese writers like to call them) against targets at sea, not even at abandoned ships, never mind more manoeuvrable unmanned surface vessels. Maybe these messages will become less “toothless” if the PLA stops just firing at sand dunes in deserts."