>>5074856 (lb)
If I were to proceed simply on that interpretation alone.(your sauce) I would point out that that article says there is still contention as to the name and its meaning.
The author is simply making an assertion on context alone disregarding many other instances in the Bible where a seemingly innocuous text makes an earth shattering revelation.
If it was simply naming a random creature then why was it given a proper name.
KJV fags are truly something claiming an authorive work in what the 16th century?
Is Azazel that the scapegoat was sent to each year and other demons named in the Bible mere creatures as well?
I can google 3 articles that take a different approach to the argument ending “Facts” you have posted as sauce.
I also have my own sauce of facing a “fallen one” in the flesh and surviving to be here shitposting this evening.
Lilith is a real demon.
You have a long long way to go in your red pilling of biblical study fren.
Do you even Book of Enoch bro? Which Jesus himself referred to.
Or perhaps the Assumption of Moses written about in Jude?
I bet you are of the opinion if it isn’t in the Bible it can’t be true.