>>5077431

That's selling AOC short, in my estimation.

The woman is blisteringly intelligent, and I don't have too many questions about her moral alignment. I am fairly certain she is a good person.

She is stating nothing that isn't "fact" in the world of democrats, and is taking them to task. If their research and claims about climate change are true - then why are they dragging their feet about actually getting something done?

I'm not seeing anything "unreasonable" from her in the sense that she represents the logical conclusion of what my generation was taught as a matter of fact. Fossil fuels were going to run out in our lifetime, capitalism has failed and concentrated wealth, etc. So, if these things are true - then why are we not addressing them?

I am sure there are people around AOC who will try to ride in her wake - and the larger democrat party is going to try and flip her staff. "AOC is bright, but temporary, come to the comforts of the party."

Even if AOC is not "ours" - she is certainly not "theirs" and is someone I see as being reasonable. Whether she will agree or disagree over what method is used to address the problems we face is not as important as the fact she is certainly against and aware of the current problems.

Women's suffrage is a good thing, even if the democrats have made a mockery of it. We will ultimately see where she lines up, though, as things unfold. I would be surprised if she ends up in the "cabal" territory, but would not be surprised if many around her are looking to bury the cabal's knife in her back, either.

I for one, prefer the likes of Bernie and AOC to McCaskill and Biden. Assuming my understanding of their characters is accurate.

>>5077465

Assisting a friend with math homework, I became aware that math teaches logic differently from electronics. It's not that the logic, itself, is different - but there are a few standard terms.

P and Q are relevant as they denote the proposition and conclusion. If P then Q.

"Think logically."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table

I have always thought of boolean logic in terms of gate arrays and never actually bothered with tables or actually "learning" the formalities. So… Possibly a 'yeah, we knew that a year ago, retard' moment - but figured I would share.

Q is the solution. "We are the cure." When Q is valid and true, then its arguments are also true.

Is this relevant to P=C and C is the "Chair?"

Eh… Maybe. Maybe not.

>>5077570

Your conclusion is not sound.

>>5077595

This is a standard routine of psychological manipulation designed to drag out and mock a person's statements rather than engage them, logically.

You would assert that it is reasonable for a bunch of "conservative" or "right" thinking people to suddenly focus in on a junior democrat socialist for mockery? Seems a might bit unreasonable.

The "right" is equally as outraged and vitriolic toward her as McCaskill.

Regardless of what AOC turns out to be, ultimately, the focused attack on her is a known quantity and it is being driven by the deep state. You are at war, anon, start to consider how your mind is being utilized.

POTUS said all that needed to be said about it - the U.S. will not become a socialist nation.

>>5077603

Logically, it is something that will have to be done.

There will be a conversion away from fossil fuels. This is an imperative that must come at some point. Existing market technology is inadequate, but there is a lot of stuff behind classification or patent lockdown. We are looking at a space force, that means a lot of logistical and industrial support from the ground. That means a lot of power production and transportation systems.

The goals are not mutually exclusive.

"Redistribution of wealth" is also pretty much the stated goal of destroying the fed. Instead of taxing more to hand out to selected parties, however, the method is to rebalance the economy by returning to sound money rather than gimmicked currency derivatives.

Again - the goals are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

"Reasonable" people are willing to consider the means of others to achieve the same goals, and are willing to consider cooperation with them.

I decided to cooperate with Q rather than to start killing people. When I became aware of other means to the same goal, I considered them and cooperation, because the goal is more important than the means. If they can do the same thing with a more agreeable means… Then why not?

Third rule of acquisition. Never pay more than you need to.

https://youtu.be/hdQcGzbpN7s

>>5077700

Black ops, anon.

Keep in mind that the CIA was present all throughout the middle east. Do you think Syria was the first place that was going to be broken up and handed to Al Qaeda by the CIA?

Moves and counter-moves.

Bush asked for a declaration of war - an act of Congress to authorize the military an extended presence in Iraq. How did Obama handle Libya, Yemen, and Syria?

>>5077724

Projection is their greatest tool, anon.

I have read and watched her quite a bit. I do not see where she supports unreasonable things. She may support things I disagree with, but does this mean she supports the unreasonable projections cast onto those issues?

Granted, I consider most here to be unreasonable in their own way. And myself, at times - so the idea that the average person is completely reasonable in everything and at all times is, itself, an unreasonable expectation of others.

>>5077653

I thought you all realized that socialism was pretty much all that is taught in economics. Modern economic theory revolves around central banks being necessary to moderate the economy. It is simply the next logical step to fix the broken system by applying socialism.

Literally every other nation on the planet is socialist, spare for a few. From a global standpoint "America needs to get with the times."

Socialism IS the educated, academic position of pretty much every school of economics, these days.

I think AOC is actually lampooning her own education, in a way - but there again, I am a retard holding a conversation with autists who are good at finding puzzle pieces, but eat the glue stick before they can put it together… So… Meh.

>>5077604

Is there a politician in existence who is not tied to Soros, aside from DJT… If you want to consider him a politician?

Time will tell, but I don't see how AOC really helps Soros in the long run, unless it was part of the plan to try and drive democrats socialist… But it wouldn't have worked unless President Trump was in play, and it makes less sense to split the dems, now.

The only way I can see this being even remotely beneficial to Soros is if AOC can be used to instill fear into the right that socialism is going to crush America. As it stands, however, I think that is a reactionary plan. AOC wasn't supposed to get where she is, and now they are trying to badger her out of position and to use her as a wedge to excite/intimidate the right.

Keep in mind that McCaskill threatened AOC in no uncertain terms. "Shiny new object" - AKA - "target." It was after that point all of the scandals and media attention went hyperbolic.

Anons are being inducted into that threat and attack. I am not saying we have to agree with AOC - but I think many here overestimate their ability to understand the manipulation deployed against them.

>>5077881

You're missing the bigger picture.

The Missouri state Auditor who came down with a case of the suicides….

Here's the thing about Russia's involvement in Iraq… Who in Iraq was cutting the checks? Saddam? Or was Saddam's CoC embedded with CIA operatives?

There are a lot of reasons why what was really found in Iraq was kept classified.