Anonymous ID: 9e06b1 Feb. 8, 2019, 6:01 a.m. No.5078121   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5076534 What is Steyer trying to hide?

 

To pick up on anon post

https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/billionaire-tom-steyer-world-class-hypocrite.191904/

 

How? Among other things, Farallon provided funding for acquisitions and expansions to six of the largest coal mine and coal power plant buyouts in Australia and Asia since 2003. Steyer’s hypocrisy is so egregious, a group of Yale students created the website UnFarallon.info to keep track of it.

>>It is hypocrisy that also surrounds his opposition to the Keystone pipeline. As a 2014 Wall Street Journal article noted, “Mr. Steyer and the [Democrat] party’s liberal financiers are climate-change absolutists who have made killing Keystone a non-negotiable demand.” Yet 2014 was also the year it was revealed Farallon had $40 million invested in Kinder Morgan, an entity building a competitor to Keystone. That inconvenient truth elicited a promise from Steyer to sell his stock shares and donate the profits to charity.

>>In May 2016, leaked corporate documents also showed that Steyer helped to finance a company used by the family of former Chinese premier, Wen Jiabao, “to park investments in overseas tax havens,” The Washington Free Beacon reported.

>>That revelation was part of the Panama Papers scandal precipitated by a leak of 11.5 million files from the database of Mossack Fonseca, the world’s fourth largest offshore law firm. They detailed how the rich exploit offshore tax havens. “The documents shed light on the activities Steyer engaged in to earn his estimated $1.6 billion fortune, but that run counter to many political principles and causes he is now using that fortune to support,” the Free Beacon explains.

>>In short, Steyer was for anti-environmental profit-making before he was against it.

>>What about Steyers “conversion” to green energy? As The New York Times explained in 2014,

>>Farallon “has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into companies that operate coal mines and coal-fired power plants from Indonesia to China.” It further notes an examination of those records “shows that even after his highly public divestment, the coal-related projects his firm bankrolled will generate tens of millions of tons of carbon pollution for years, if not decades, to come.”

>>The Times thought this might “cloud” Steyer’s image as an environmental crusader. No doubt. But it certainly clarifies his image as a first-class fraud, one reportedly considering a run for Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s seat.

>>In the meantime, Steyer remains focused on Trump’s impeachment. “I believe we’re in an urgent political crisis,” he insists.

>>Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Ahrens isn’t particularly concerned. “If Democrats want to appease the far left and their liberal mega-donors by supporting a baseless radical effort that the vast majority of Americans disagree with, then have at it,” he told Newsweek in an email. An American Left that believes it is entitled to rule, irrespective of election results, will undoubtedly do just that, embracing every effort to delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump — by any means necessary.

>>Tom Steyer is their chief financier, a man so arrogant he believes global warming “deniers” should be prosecuted, and that impeachment proceedings can literally be bought.

>>Along with Democrat politicians. “We need people like Tom Steyer,” Harry Reid stated on May 20, 2014, two months after hammering the Kochs — and three days after it was reported that Steyer contributed $5 million to the Senate Majority PAC run by former Reid aides.

>>Apparently some efforts to “rig the system” are also more equal than others

Anonymous ID: 9e06b1 Feb. 8, 2019, 6:36 a.m. No.5078397   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Question: why if federal law supersedes state law on abortion why are all these states passing a law where doctors would go to jail if killed a baby that was born. Is this all for show to prove how powerful PP is, or is it part of the political strategy to get more concessions or money from the government. Why do this when they know their showing how despicable they are. I still think it goes back to my theory have the federal government take away or limit states rights due to the poor choices. It can’t be done without a constitutional amendment, but what else would they gain from this? It will surely motivate people to oppose dems, perhaps the dems are under the impression that POTUS and team don’t have all the voter fraud details.

Anonymous ID: 9e06b1 Feb. 8, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.5078563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8655 >>8662 >>8667 >>8677

Good for cardinal Dolan

 

Cardinal Dolan Battles Andrew Cuomo over Abortion Law

New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan has entered into a sparring match with Governor Andrew Cuomo over recently enacted abortion legislation, accusing the governor of “hiding behind labels” rather than debating facts about abortion.

 

Cardinal Dolan, the archbishop of New York, took issue particularly with a February 6 op-ed in the New York Times in which Mr. Cuomo said that the “religious right,” including Dolan, was “spreading falsehoods about abortion laws to inflame their base.”

 

In a response Thursday, Cardinal Dolan criticized the governor’s use of name-calling with labels like the “religious right,” insisting that the abortion issue is not a matter of confessional belief or political partisanship but of commonsense protections of human life.

 

“The civil rights of the helpless, innocent, baby in the womb, as liberal Democrat Pennsylvania Governor Robert Casey once remarked is not about right versus left, but right versus wrong,” Dolan noted.

 

Linking me with the religious right is “something new from the governor,” the cardinal added. “He did not consider me part of the ‘religious right’ when seeking my help with the minimum wage increase, prison reform, protection of migrant workers, a welcome of immigrants and refugees, and advocacy for college programs for the state’s inmate population.”

 

Advocacy for the human rights of the pre-born infant cannot be reduced to a “Catholic issue,” Dolan continued, which is “an insult to our allies of so many religions, or none at all.”

 

Citing Governor Casey a second time, Dolan wrote: “I didn’t get my pro-life belief from my religion class in a Catholic school, but from my biology and U.S. Constitution classes.”

 

“Debate abortion on what it is,” the cardinal concluded. “Don’t hide behind labels like ‘right wing’ and ‘Catholic.’”

 

A sweeping poll conducted in January revealed that 75 percent of Americans want substantial legal restrictions on abortion, including 60 percent of Democrats and 61 percent of those who identify as “pro-choice.”

 

A significant majority of Americans support legal restrictions on abortion while two-thirds of Americans want Roe revisited to allow for state regulation of abortion or to ban it altogether, the survey found.

 

According to the poll, a full 75 percent of Americans say abortion should be limited to — at most — the first three months of pregnancy.

Anonymous ID: 9e06b1 Feb. 8, 2019, 7:01 a.m. No.5078660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8720 >>8784

This doesn’t make sense to me, because in the late 70s early 80s lots of white or non black women were actiually getting fros-permed their hair. It was a style and fad and went away, further she looks tanned not blackface and the dress was the style at the time

 

‘The View’ Host Joy Behar Under Fire for Use of Blackface