Anonymous ID: be53f4 Feb. 8, 2019, 10:39 a.m. No.5081195   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1357 >>1507 >>1558 >>1560 >>1763 >>1867

Did The Department Of Justice Protect Brenda Snipes From Prosecution For Ballot Destruction?

 

"A vast caldera of public rage has rightfully been aimed at Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Brenda Snipes over the last few years. However, it is important to remember that Wasserman-Schultz and Snipes are merely the public faces of an extensive, deeply problematic system of corruption. It is then also essential to understand who, and what mechanisms, have allowed figures like Wasserman-Schultz, Snipes, the Awan brothers, and others to go unprosecuted…"

 

"…In stories like this, the image painted of the Department of Justice is one of a federal agency that functions in a manner far more akin to organized crime than to a governmental body. The DOJ’s refusal prosecute the Awans, and Rosenstein’s alleged decision to prevent legal consequences for Brenda Snipes shows us that corruption allowed to stagnate in Broward County affected the whole country. The public could, therefore, be forgiven for directing a portion of their collective wrath towards the DOJ for enabling such criminal behavior.

 

If the Department of Justice refuses to prosecute such crimes as detailed in the Awan scandal and as committed by Snipes, how can the public hope to hold their government accountable for election interference and other forms of corruption?"

 

Moar:

 

https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/02/did-the-department-of-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-from-prosecution-for-ballot-destruction/

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-07/did-department-justice-protect-brenda-snipes-prosecution-ballot-destruction