Anyone here that understand how it's possible that there was a 5 to 4 vote on this last week, yet no proof of life for RBG? The whole "reading oral transcripts from home" thing was shaky but to make rulings without being present seems like something that is highly unethical and inappropriate IMO.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/7/john-roberts-joins-liberal-justices-supreme-court-/