are there any "laws" making it clear that to have a vote counted, presence MUST be in person or in extreme circumstances, must be noted as officially having heard the case through and passed vote to another party in the witness? Not 100% familiar on that part of the machine. I doubt very much that POTUS would allow rules to be broken……..the entire RGB sounds like "checkmate" to me, really….as one way or another, only TRUTH will satisfy the masses that have been made aware of the moves being made…..
And in the case of which she did in fact under no duress make a vote after hearing the case, implying she is also of sound mind to do so, then no amount of "We couldn't tell anyone about her whereabouts due to Nat Sec" is gonna be sufficient… JMO, of course, but the sleeping giant sleeps no more…