Anonymous ID: f6757f Feb. 8, 2019, 9:31 p.m. No.5088666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8740 >>8780

>>5088613

They hated John Paul II for this, he gave the scientific answer and removed all religion from the conversation.

 

1995 ((Abortion is why they tried to kill him))

 

  1. Some people try to justify abortion by claiming that the result of conception, at least up to a certain number of days, cannot yet be considered a personal human life. But in fact, "from the time that the ovum is fertilized, a life is begun which is neither that of the father nor the mother; it is rather the life of a new human being with his own growth.

 

It would never be made human if it were not human already. This has always been clear, and … modern genetic science offers clear confirmation. It has demonstrated that from the first instant there is established the programme of what this living being will be: a person, this individual person with his characteristic aspects already well determined.

 

Right from fertilization the adventure of a human life begins, and each of its capacities requires time-a rather lengthy time-to find its place and to be in a position to act".57

 

Even if the presence of a spiritual soul cannot be ascertained by empirical data, the results themselves of scientific research on the human embryo provide "a valuable indication for discerning by the use of reason a personal presence at the moment of the first appearance of a human life: how could a human individual not be a human person?".

 

58

http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html

Anonymous ID: f6757f Feb. 8, 2019, 9:44 p.m. No.5088777   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5088740

YES! I keep that link bookmarked. I no longer attempt to engage. But it brings the conversation to a legal one and hence their fear of the SCOTUS pic and Catholics.