Anonymous ID: 1aa071 Feb. 9, 2019, 2:12 a.m. No.5090138   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0158

>>5090041

I would say that some of us know things you don't… Which is true, but it's also part of the public record and available for you to review.

 

Moves and counter-moves, anon. You are forgetting that this is an old game that has been played by both 'parties' for a very long time. Iraq was going to undergo a regime change one way or another. That fate was sealed. It could either be turned over to the CIA/MI6, or it could be placed under military authority and a governing body.

 

History tells us who won that argument. What happened when Obama took office?

This isn't a difficult war to figure out once you know what you are looking at through history. The anti-war option was just not viable at the time.

 

In absolute theoretical terms, sure - but the theory of a concept is separate from the means of imposing that concept. Future will prove past on this.

Anonymous ID: 1aa071 Feb. 9, 2019, 2:15 a.m. No.5090145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0242 >>0285

>>5090135

Hubby was largely responsible for her 'campaign' for the SCOTUS position, and her link to Clinton.

What is interesting is how suddenly the decision to name her as the nominee came, among the myriad of personal connections, as well.