Anonymous ID: 472771 Feb. 9, 2019, 5:34 p.m. No.5098580   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8604 >>8612 >>8639 >>8703

From two breads ago

 

>>5097425 pb

>>5097808 pb

>>5097901 pb

>>5097885 pb

 

I don't get why this is not notable. I've left the the whole JFK jr. thing as plausible but certainly inconclusive and improbable or whatever. I also understand it has been a source of ridicule for the board from the normies or likes of Bill Maher or whoever (over the target? who knows?). That said, I'd agree it's been beaten like a dead horse, but that still doesn't mean posts with allusions, direct or tangential, to JFK jr. need to be treated as taboo or relegated as slides IMHO. It's an interesting topic that many anons are following in their periphery without having to go into slide discussions.

 

That Pecker is in the spotlight, this seemed notable to me. The only slide being this little discussion as to why it has to be considered not notable as a potential slide is sorta an elephant in the room.

 

My two cents.