Let's think critically about Jeff Bezos.

What we know:

• MSM has turned on Bozo. Even CNN. He's being trashed personally re: his divorce, professionally re: his monopoly/practices. Netflix did a hit piece on Amazon. His work for CIA has been spotlighted. His ethics/conflict of interests have been discussed. Legitimacy of WashingtonPost, etc.

• Billionaire cabalists don't get bad press unless it's orchestrated for a purpose or targeting someone.

• Patriots in full control. We are watching a movie. Disinfo is necessary. Controlled op used for disclosure.

Who is Bozo's time in the media spotlight helping? His takedown is casting doubt about:

• Intelligence community data keeping/security, tech giant monopolies, media conflicts of interest, ethics and hypocrisy of the "elite."

• POTUS' slapfight with Bozo on Twitter is consistent with the bread and circus we see with figures like Kim Jong Un, where we know deals are made behind closed doors and are playing out in public on a schedule.

We can also infer reasonably that White Hats would want access to the data Amazon has from Alexa devices/home cameras.

We can also infer reasonably knowing what we know about Bozo's nude scandals and affairs that there is some type of leverage over him.

Could Bozo have been flipped? Could he be supplying data to NSA? Could he be playing a role in exposing CIA data storage and scope of spying? In exposing Yellow Journalism? In setting the stage for legislature concerning certain types of monopolies or business practices? Privacy law?

Could he be one of Q's GREAT ACTORS?

>>5100366

Netflix just did a 30 minute anti-Amazon take-down on the show The Patriot Act. Even CNN has been talking about his character in a negative light surrounding the divorce, nudes, affair, etc.

>>5100369

TL;DR: Could Jeff Bezos be an "actor" in the Q show, being used to expose, take-down, create precedent for new legislature concerning the relevant issues (security, privacy, media monopoly, business ethics). Additionally, could NSA be using the data Amazon collects from their various Alexa devices?

>>5100358

I could obviously be on the wrong track with my conclusions here. But if he's not a "secret white hat" so to speak, or at least cooperating, I still think it's reasonable to consider how much data his Alexa devices collect that would be valuable to the white hats.

He may be targeted by Q+ for the reasons I mentioned without being cooperative, though. At the very least, I think it's obvious that his recent attention seems planned as a move that benefits our movement.

>>5100498

>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID DECLAS WOULD BRING DOWN THE HOUSE AND THEN NO DELCAS AND THE REPUBLICANS LOST THE HOUSE???

Declas WOULD bring down the house. It's leverage over their heads that seems to be being used.

>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID THERE WOULD BE A RED WAVE, RED OCTOBER, RED TSUNAMI AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS STOLE THE ELECTION???

Senate majority secured. That's what's important. POTUS vs. Pelosi makes for a better SHOW that people are paying attention to. House may have been allowed to be stolen for election rigging evidence, but it was not a loss for us in our agenda.

>REMEMBER WHEN Q POSTED A FAKE VIDEO OF OBAMA AND CLAIMED IT WAS REAL???

Video was edited in a specific way that showed how messages were contained in broad daylight. That edit was produced by using the date of the speech as a corresponding time in the video to make cuts.

>REMEMBER WHEN Q POSTED A FAKE PODESTA EMAIL AND CLAIMED IT WAS REAL???

Unverified does not mean fake.

>REMEMBER WHEN Q POSTED A SHOPPED STOCKED PHOTO OF AF1 AND Q CLAIMED HE PERSONALLY GOT THE PHOTO FROM INSIDE AF1???

Anons confirmed subtle but key differences that indicated a unique photo STAGED as the stock photo that seemed to carry a message to THEM.

>>5100509

>>5100386

>>5100426

>>5100467

>>5100468

Anons are keeping me humble. I concede I am likely wrong to suggest Bezos is FLIPPED or even cooperating. But I think what I am noticing indicates a coordinated effort to put Bezos and all he's connected to in the spotlight in a way that benefits MAGA.

He may simply be a key target in the process of exposure and setting the stage for action. His cooperation isn't necessary for what's happening, but it does seem apparent to me that this goes beyond Bozo suffering some misfortune. What stands to be gained from shining a public light on his dirty dealings and from White Hats gaining access to all that Alexa has heard and seen is too massive of a domino to fall on its own.

>>5100527

>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE HOUSE WAS NECESSARY FOR WHAT COMES NEXT THEN THE DEMS WON THE HOUSE???

Think about the two possible outcomes and our objectives. In our reality, the democrat won House vs. POTUS and co has exposed the democrats as hypocritical, self-interested, stubborn, unreasonable, obstructionists, petty, immature, arrogant, bitter, unhinged, and more.

The conflicts have caused people to tune in and pay attention. It allowed for a spotlight on the issues, such as immigration at the present. POTUS redpilled millions on what's happening at the border and successfully framed the national conversation about the topic as STARTING with acknowledging that there's a crisis. He's gone from the xenophobically smeared "build the wall to keep the brown people out" perception to "the wall seems to be the most efficient solution to the danger we're exposed to."

If Republicans won the House, the dems would still look like powerless victims. Trump would seem like he was just wielding his power and having his lackies forward his ego-driven agenda. Normies would tune out and keep hating.

The conflict is GOOD for keeping eyes focused on places where red-pills can be found and exposing the core of both side's motivations.

>>5101072

Just checked, Q has never predicted. Q leaves breadcrumbs to find our way BACK. Future confirms past. Present does not predict future.