Asked to repost by baker.

>>5100527 (pb)

>REMEMBER WHEN Q SAID THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE HOUSE WAS NECESSARY FOR WHAT COMES NEXT THEN THE DEMS WON THE HOUSE???

Think about the two possible outcomes and our objectives. In our reality, the democrat won House vs. POTUS and co has exposed the democrats as hypocritical, self-interested, stubborn, unreasonable, obstructionists, petty, immature, arrogant, bitter, unhinged, and more.

The conflicts have caused people to tune in and pay attention. It allowed for a spotlight on the issues, such as immigration at the present. POTUS redpilled millions on what's happening at the border and successfully framed the national conversation about the topic as STARTING with acknowledging that there's a crisis. He's gone from the xenophobically smeared "build the wall to keep the brown people out" perception to "the wall seems to be the most efficient solution to the danger we're exposed to."

If Republicans won the House, the dems would still look like powerless victims. Trump would seem like he was just wielding his power and having his lackies forward his ego-driven agenda. Normies would tune out and keep hating.

The conflict is GOOD for keeping eyes focused on places where red-pills can be found and exposing the core of both side's motivations.

>>5101111

>LOOK, PLANET WILL BE SAFE.

quads confirm.

>>5101092

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

Q's link embedded for the lazy.

>>5101160

Late by literally milliseconds! Hivemind.

Could part of the Scaramucci model be akin to the way the "Untouchables" were used to combat the mob?

Temporary status creates a sort of invulnerability to slander and lack of opportunity to be bribed/compromised. Creates relative impartiality, presents an outsider who can make radical changes/firings as they are not entrenched in the existing system or connected to the people and local dynamics, and provides a scapegoat for controversial/unpopular actions?

>>5101465

Dark to light is important. But to get someone comfortably into the light requires those in the dark becoming aware they are in the dark, becoming motivated to seek the light, and having the time/gradual exposure to give their eyes time to adjust.

Otherwise they will remain ignorant, fearful, or uninterested of the light. Or, worse yet, find the light too painful and overwhelming to handle.

Q+ is doing this the right way. I think most of us can see it happening around us. I know we are all eager and some are getting impatient. But we aren't on our schedule. Where We Go 1 We Go ALL. And that means considering, caring for, and gently guiding those who need the most during this process.

Those in the dark are THEIR victims and mental hostages. Not our enemies. The SHOW may be enjoyable for us, but it's necessary for them. The plan is not just to defeat the cabal, but to do so comprehensively and in a way that maintains the most order, frees the most people, and ensures the most permanent possible safeguards for our future.

>>5101625

We have to keep in mind that it is not just patriots who have eyes on this board. Anything Q posts is scrutinized by THEM as well.

>>5101747

The echos aren't comprehensive enough or specific enough to describe THEM all in my opinion. It's not JUST (((them))) and (((they))) aren't all a united front. The implications of the echo is too simplistic and incomplete from what I can gather. There are important questions and redpills about (((them))) that need discussion and exposure, but this fight and movement goes beyond the Jewish supremicists

>>5101783

This is war, anon. We cannot expect to escape it without tragedy and loss.