Anonymous ID: 284285 Feb. 9, 2019, 8:37 p.m. No.5101856   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1869 >>1984 >>2158

SUPER MEGA ULTRA Q DROP DECODES FROM TODAY

 

My first Q decode thag made notables earlier today was…

>>5097348 Q drop decode: Was Q acknowledging notables from pb re: "optics?" see proof #1

17 minute delta

 

I’ve since had Q confirm twice moar with 18 and 19 min deltas accordingly

_______

18 Minute delta

Here’s me explaining second one in this earlier post >>5099756

So this is the second time today Q has mirrored notable post from the bread before, giving a nod to the post. He just dropped in bread #6512 and his drop shared the theme of this notable post from #6511 >>5098095 Anon asks how an honest MSM would portray Israel v. Palestine

And in bread #6510, we had this notable explaining how Q did it earlier with his posts.

>>5097348 Q drop decode: Was Q acknowledging notables from pb re: "optics?"

So its quite obvious what’s going on here…. Q wants us to read between the lines.

When thousands of occultfags are arrested, the majority if them will also happen to be rich jews and the media will cry “antisemite”… so djt and Q have been very smart about their OPTICS… because not all jews is true and its also true that the babylonian occult rituals have their roots in Pharisees, who hijacked and subverted the religion of Moses with their oral traditions (Talmud) and black gay magic (Kabbalah).

The JQ is legit but we must not let the media think we are condemning all Jews.

 

______

19 min delta

>>5100750 lb my post regarding third Q proof of theory.

>um, guys… this theory is correct. Just proven again lb. Go to last bread and search for “read between the lines”… only used twice.. the above post was first and then Q gave another “nod” by using same line - like he did with other posts from today.

>The post below is still in notables

>>>5097348 Q drop decode: Was Q acknowledging notables from pb re: "optics?"

>This is now the third cryptic message Q has sent today that proves the theory.

>PAY ATTENTION ANONS

>Baker missed it lb cus the Q post made it frantic but earlier bakers included it in notables cus it was solid - and now Q has confirmed it twice since that earlier notable.

 

If this theory was notable earlier today and it has since been proved by Q 2 additional times… it should be notable again.

 

I’m phone fagging so shitty screen shots, my bad fags.

Anonymous ID: 284285 Feb. 9, 2019, 9:03 p.m. No.5102265   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5102217

again, everything u say is a lie. why does mine show much responses and plenty of anons agreeing???. and some reeeing from u mossad coowns.

 

How retatded are u?? u lying faggot.