>>5103571

Because God is not 'god.'

The ancient tribes often considered themselves to be the descendants/followers of a patron god or goddess.

"Pro Aris et Focis" - the old latin phrase meaning "For what we arose from and what we gather around" or "for hearth and home" or "god and country" depending on exactly how you want to interpret it.

The Aris (arise) refers to the origins of a person - their tribe and the god their tribe grounds their belief in. They were either chosen by this god or were directly created from this god or are part of its mortal lineage on Earth. The Focis is the altar to this god that was the basis for a community, a country, and culture.

The "god" we worship now is a hybrid entity composed of God and the likeness of a specific god of the scribes and rulers from babylonian times. Molek/moloch and the bull. Effectively, a god claimed to be God and their followers overthrew the leadership of the old tribes, replacing their worship of their tribal god and its place within the pantheon with the worship of the god of rulers - the king of kings, so to speak.

God is a concept, however. God as a life force or entity reigns above the figures revered as "gods." Even the old gods recognized this and the old religions recalled that there were concepts above and beyond the powers of the pantheon. In the greek mythos, gaia and neptune gave birth to the titans, who in turn gave birth to the gods. In ancient customs of assyria and babylonia, there were the dragons apsu and tiamat - yang and yin, respectively.

We worship the likeness of moloch with some attributes and likenesses of Saturn, elevated to the status of Neptune/Gaia as one (fraudulently, I might add).

Many of the books in the Bible come from prophets and scholars who followed El Shaddai (god was not one for a very long time, and was later retconned into all of these names meaning the same god concept, rather than the pantheon they originally fell within). This is important because El Shaddai is the god of the wilderness and the mountain dwellers. The Sage. The Hermit.

But I am getting off track. Satan is a god who sought to become God by devouring the creations of other gods. His wish was granted in the nature of his trial and sentencing. What do you think the Tree of Knowledge was? It was satan and all of his knowledge.

We stand above gods (or will), and are the next evolutionary form in the pursuit of understanding God. Satan was rather stupid and just believed the secret was "know thyself" and to consume more power.

There are those who still believe that and, seeing themselves as the embodiment of the will of satan, believe it is their duty to resurrect the god. Whether you worship the current figure of god, or embrace the raw pursuit of power and authority over those around you, you ironically worship the same entity and are food for its resurrection.

Whether this is literal or metaphorical is kind of a moot point. Why is it that the radical left and a number of church officials find themselves in such odd agreement with each other as politics increasingly finds its way into the pulpit?

>>5103713

Molech, the bull, was the god of masculinity and culture. To a point many today would consider…. Barbaric.

"Toxic masculinity."

For a god which demanded the sacrifice of children and other such things - I imagine a number of women would consider such a being rather heinous. As well as many rational men.

It is kind of a rather twisted and perverted slander for these groups proclaiming to be a revival of matriarchal orders to convince young women to be supportive of abortion and against the development of families.

>>5103740

Audit of the military got a lot harder after the accounting section of the Pentagon was hit.

Hassan Al Banna. Al Qaeda is CIA. Yugoslavia - Embassy in Croatia, 1994. Tuzla Air Base "black aircraft."

Pattern look familiar?

Benghazi

ISIS

Why would FBI director Mueller sign for the hotel rooms used by the 9/11 hijackers prior to their attacks the following day?

Can the CIA operate domestically?

Can the FBI operate domestically?

Define leverage.

Lies by omission.

Exculpatory [redacted].

>>5103619

Some parts of the clock are T-minus on the mission timer. Some parts are T-plus on the mission timer.

Sec_test was letting us know that events following were likely related to the second on their posting. Likely parts of the "seconds" on the countdown.

I doubt we are looking at events being a direct 1:1 for hours-to-days. Maybe, but that seems irrelevant to the staging/sequence of events. The clock is Q/POTUS clock. Not our clock. "At my time." As we used to say in the military, meaning we are following their cadence.

>>5103988

Only for those posts on that day, anon. Q follows a pattern after doing a sec_test, a series of drops and THEN begins engaging anons. While he does this normally, as well - the timing of his posts that are not in response to other anons are part of the clock/timing. Those following the sec_test have seconds as a significant digit/factor.

Perhaps it is not down to the individual second - perhaps it is. Perhaps a special routine was in play for those posts to allow them to be posted with a consistent network lag.

Q wouldn't post a sec_test publicly unless it was meant for us to work with. He could just make a post and then derive a second delta off of that. Sec_test was made specifically as part of the map/code/timer-thingymaflitchit.

>>5104058

That makes even less sense, anon.

Explain how it could possibly be a security test, or why Q would particularly care to post "sec_test".

Why would Q post "sec_test" rather than just posting what he has to say? From a security standpoint, it makes no difference what the content of the message is, and we can assume that he performs security checks on the board routinely and using something far more than a post.

>>5104079

Q is letting us know that we are still in the countdown phase.

At T-3 hours we get a weather brief.

Storm warning.