Anonymous ID: 2da1cd Feb. 10, 2019, 2:57 a.m. No.5104682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5104670

I am just glad I was able to salvage all those drawings from an old computer - had to pull the drive as would not boot and hook it up to another old computer.

Anonymous ID: 2da1cd Feb. 10, 2019, 3:54 a.m. No.5104816   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4828 >>4839 >>4854

>>5104809

probably at least half the harder stuff.

The geometry is easy it is the shifting dimensions and the angles (and that is relative) that is a bitch.

Every time you shift dimensions the normal 3D warps more and turns in and out on itself.

Anonymous ID: 2da1cd Feb. 10, 2019, 4:01 a.m. No.5104837   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5104828

I do geometry

I know that EM fields that mimic geometry can affect 3 and 4 D.

I know there is more dimensions based upon chaos theory and fractals.

Anonymous ID: 2da1cd Feb. 10, 2019, 4:20 a.m. No.5104920   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5104898

the folding equations depend upon Lorentz as the field is set and true and only the perception is different. We have this issue because we try and measure the field from within the set not as the entire set.