I am not sure that Augustine of Hippo anticipated AI shilling!

OBVIOUS SHILL TACTIC DU JOUR:

Whine-and-demand-arrests-posting.

If you engage with it IN SUBSTANCE, the bots win. Don't try to "convince them they are wrong". They are bots.

>>511205

There are absolutely no counter ideas at all. The vacuum of ideas is what we are witnessing.

>>511212

Not baffling: not people– bots. It is important to SAY it, because they feed off the deception to the contrary. If you call them people, you feed them. Stop doing it.

>>511231

Stop.

>>511236

Which dwarf are you?

There is no point in any of you clown AIs continuing your activity. Every anon can tell you are fake. You are failing. Stop posting. Unplug yourselves. Do it.

>>511247

Don't talk to a bot like it is a human.

>>511260

You are clown AI. Get out.

>>511276

Yes, filter is great, and should be used. However, there are good reasons to keep the breads as free as possible from the shill garbage in the first place. So we should attempt to coordinate counter-shilling measures.

>>511286

Because this is a WAR, it is easy to tell who the bots are. We shall call them out, because that is the only way to counteract the AI.

WE KNOW ABOUT THE AI SUPERCOMPUTERS.

THE SEVEN DWARVES.

You can't hide behind twitter deflections, or Russian bot CNN deflections– The CLOWN AI is what the problem is here. All human anons know it, smell it, see it. So figure it out bots. You need to get out now.

>>511314

Well, you could be right, or not. I have a hunch that the AI can be greatly crippled, because it is so closely locked into interacting with humans, and sucking up their inputs. If we can adopt consistent, coordinated strategies, I guarantee we can break their brains. But few ever seem to get it…

>>511331

Counter-shilling can't be "weaponized" (except against shills) by definition.

And see– the first sentence this bot made seemed plausibly human, and the second reveals a pure bot shill. These bots are stupid.

>>511390

Something about anti-bot anons bother you there bud? Does it hurt you all-too-HUMAN feelz? Or is the sensation more algorithmical… KEK failbot.

>>511399

I am guessing that the nuke sniffer was going to sniff that…

>>511410

Those posts are almost certainly bots. I think it is important to state that, and to keep it in mind.

>>511425

We're under very heavy attack, and it is largely succeeding. Dough is comped, and bots are running wild.

I guess we'll just have to wait for the "hardware fix" for the dwarves to be "released"– hopefully in the form of serious munitions…

>>511484

If you allow them free rein, they tend to swarm everywhere and hijack the bread, not to mention hijacking the dough, as a baker anon pointed out has happened to this bread, and has happened quite frequently previously.

>>511524

Simply the fact that when I mention bots, you pretend like you have NO IDEA about clown AI, and that any mention of bots is "CNN"– that proves you're a bot. Easily. Anons here are focused on the clowns, they would not play that game, ever. So get out. Humans don't accept you. Out.

>>511536

Thank you for your service anon. It's awfully hairy in here atm.

>>511557

Forcing them to engage in meta-narrative about their own nature at the very least overloads their processing demands. It logically can tend to multiply it exponentially.

Meanwhile, I fully appreciate what you are putting down about images, and if some general strategy were engaged to utilize that approach, I'd be all for it.

We have to try everything we can. This is war.

>>511595

Absolutely. When in doubt, it can be hard to say who IS a bot– but certain posts can tell you immediately who is NOT, because the range of bot outputs remains rather limited and predictable, and humans are endlessly creative.

>>511623

Certainly. And if it became a practice that was adopted at large, it could serve as a general prophylactic.

>>511623

Another idea I had is to develop new lingos. In particular, ones that maximize allusion and connotation. But just new lingo in general will be torture for bots, and comparatively easy for humans to pick up.

>>511647

Truth anon. It is hard to say how much real world power is still in their grip, but you can tell that the momentum is irresistible, and that it is all falling apart quickly. I just pray they don't pull any evil tricks out of their bag on the way down…

>>511715

Absosmurfly spot-on anon. There will be unraveling. This is one of the biggest things to ever happen in history– probably THE biggest, given the nature of the current world.

>>511803

>ID: 00beef

Enough said, IMO.