Transparency, but only up to 40%, right Q? Irreparable harm and all that shit?
You're forgetting Q said we only get 40% of it. That's not being transparent in my book.
So Q Potus, Obungo, HRC, Soros, etc. etc.etc. can all know but we are too weak and fragile to handle it?
Nope, not me.
Never claimed there shouldn't be some secrets, to prevent enemies from knowing our secrets. However, that's not what Q was referring to. He was talking about how sick these people are. The depth and breadth of their crimes. We are destined to make this mistake again without a much greater transparency than 40%. People NEED to know just how sick and evil the world can be so we can guard against it.
Look how close we are to repeating history again.
Not Wray.
Apples and oranges. We still have our weapons.
If you have control of the media like you said, is this being allowed for a purpose?
Some here will argue 100% needed. I can accept 80%.
40% is not even close to being transparent.
Agreed. There is a difference between the crimes committed and they investigation used to uncover those crimes. If crimes committed involved top secret stuff, it needs to come out and an end to that method that was used. Ex: FVEY.
There were supposed safe guards in place to prevent what happened, yet it happened anyway. Trust the FBI again? NEVER. I don't care how many it prosecuted. The corruption has trickled down to "rank and file" agents. Whole agency is beyond repair and should be removed.