>>5111072

You have changed your tactic. You still assert there is what you call a "bot system" but now you present your idea as a premise to which people replying to you seem to agree, unless they explicitly dispute it. Same exact tactic that reporters use to elicit comments from interviewees, which are then taken out of context and used as the basis for false articles and fake news. Where did you learn that, in journalism school?

I don't agree with anything you post.

Ever.

Why?

Because you have a hidden agenda and it is not pro-Trump or pro-Q or pro-America or pro-We-the-People.

I have always distrusted hidden agendas.

You'll continue to be filtered.

>>5111352

There you go again, inserting a false premise into your dialog.

Your false premises is that if I don't interact with you it's because I'm "shy and ran away".

That is false.

It is highly deceptive, even evil, to insert false premises into a question.

The devil is a trickster.

Is he your daddy?

The article Q posted was about Skolkovo, the Russian technology partnership from which the Clintons profited.

Dug on this a while back. Read the small print on these infographs.