>>5112566 Don't think the dims will ever regain the WH, but that they will implode forever pretty soon now. BUT if they ever DO get it back by any means, we will be fighting for our lives immediately. They want us to die slow and hard. Or if Beast Swalwell has his way, conservative areas will just be nuked, with his fellow loons in the area just being written off as collateral damage. He ain't kiddin', and neither are his fellow hyenas.
>>5112939 Any MF can be in a so-called elite unit. But if he is following Marxists, he is less than nothing in my eyes, a chancre on the asshole of humanity.
>>5113023 He paid for that mike.
> the vast numbers of people (the ones who may still have the remnants of a moral compass) who are unwittingly helping the Deep State accomplish their dark agenda.
The moral dilemma, at least for me, is whether to judge these people or forgive them (or both). Their unwillingness to challenge the narrative and explore reality to learn the facts for themselves is to some degree resppnsible for the Deep State's death-grip on society. Could these "unwitting" individuals have done more? Should they have? Do they bear responsibility for their shortcomings and weakness, when others (we anons) expended great effort to learn the truth and tell the truth, at high personal cost?
Are they culpable for passively permitting what the Deep state has done to us, or are they victims we should pity?
P.S. and this is a deeply personal question/dilemma, because it's about family members who shunned the information that was offered them, and time and time against chose the easier course of believing the narrative and despising the messenger (the anon).
>>5112587 Saw an article about a Dick's Sporting Goods that didn't do well on opening day: Dick's Soft Opening