>>5117182

TY Baker!!!

Much appreciated.

>>5117410

>>5117410

Let's do a reveal and put it to rest!

>>5117480

You already know who is going to ask POTUS, anon.

>>5117556

There are journos instructed to not ask by their MOS bosses, and there are journos that are read in, and know not to ask yet. Think about POTUS' previous interviews, and which journo was most supportive/friend.

>>5117650

>>5117650

No disrespect meant, but I repeat:

>>5117434

>>5117434

>>5117588

This would not be a bad thing, necessarily…

>>5117754

Here we go with this shit again. Probably one of the few things I actually disagree with.

>>5117860

>>5117860

Agreed.

A privately owned or publicly traded company should be able to content regulate how they see fit. It's called "buyer beware". If Q and team want to "acquire" Twitter, Facebook, etc., and force them to the constitution, IBOR is unnecessary.