Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 10:46 p.m. No.5118848   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5118790

>Super old news and yet to this day we never had heard his Testimony.

So what. Since when is YOUR schedule important? How many people have

you prosecuted, let alone those involved in sedition treason involving

hundreds, if not thousands of individuals, a completely corrupt prior administration,

billions, if not trillions of dollars of funds, and multiple countries?

None? Thought so.

 

>They are Still in Control.

Nonsense. See above point.

 

>How does a Deputy AG defy Congress for 2yrs+ to deny to let an underling Testify before Congress?

He doesn't work for them? Seriously, where do you people get your understanding of how our government works?

 

>Whose in Charge?

Who is, you mean? Trump, of course. Duh.

 

>Not the American People.

Well, we elected Trump, so there's thatโ€ฆ Lurk moar. Or KYS. Either works.

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 10:49 p.m. No.5118873   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5118811

Exactly. The SS detail is the proof right there. If they were actually kept on after

she had died, it would be because the USSS, and by extension, Trump, wanted

them to stay. Which means he knows either way.

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 11:03 p.m. No.5118997   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9029

>>5118977

The letter was the same published in August, 2017. Recall the story then was

that Trump refused to accept. You are correct, it was planned. They might not

have known exactly when they'd be ready. Since it happened, that's a sure

sign things are progressing, however.

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 11:35 p.m. No.5119217   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9248 >>9249

>>5119184

Without it they could have shut down any investigations into their crimes. They

could have been in control of the narrative. Sessions would have been in a

tough spot, knowing what he knows, but unable to leave because they would

never allow a proper replacement.

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 11:45 p.m. No.5119277   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5119249

True dat, though I think they expected to lose the House. Trump didn't pitch

many House races as heavily as the Senate races, and the Democrats

were really exposed in this election (only 8 or 9 R seats were up).

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 11:56 p.m. No.5119337   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9391

>>5119322

I agree. Even being aware isn't sufficient. We naturally fall back

into our old habits. They're comfortable. What POTUS and Q are

fighting is this unwillingness to move from our comfy couches.

It's a scary world, but it doesn't need to be.

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 10, 2019, 11:57 p.m. No.5119345   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5119330

Impeached yes (the House does that), convicted, no. Think of impeachment

as the political equivalent of indictment. You still go to trial, and the

conviction/acquittal is ultimately what matters. Though as far as

optics goโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: f3f3a4 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:12 a.m. No.5119441   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5119409

For whatever reason I was thinking of that scene in 5th Element when Willis' character

Dallas got the leader of the Mangalores to out himself. It's not totally similar, but

seemed like an appropriate head fake.