I wonder just how good the ratings were due to hwoodanon….I didn't bother watching, actually, I don't think I have EVER watched……
kek…I wonder how many actually understand that
you can't be serious…..I suppose were there a vax for being gay AND a vax for AIDS, you would choose the former…..
I actually do remember that being in circulation……ironic…….
what's your point? Age verification? I remember a dude that chopped down a cheery tree too….
ehhh, perhaps…but wouldn't that mean there is defense against getting it (upping the "vax's work" agenda) rather than there being a "cure" for it (as opposed to "treatment")
I can think of another possibility to the "AIDS" deal….
What if certain targets were selected, shot with a toxin that felt like a bug bite, later became sick, visitted the hospital with symptoms, bloodwork was done (although no documentation exists of ever having isolated the source in any tests) and the patient was told they have the disease, given medicine at high cost which KEPT them sick…..you can run with that should you choose…
Facts of the matter as far as I am aware is the diagnosis of HIV/AIDS relies on antibodies present…as I said…not ONCE has there been documentation of isolation of source. If I am wrong, I apologize….news is pretty fucky nowadays.