Anonymous ID: 92f390 Feb. 11, 2019, 11:47 a.m. No.5124840   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5124826

Is the GOOGLE DEEP DREAM MEME a sign of a bot?

 

Do bots all post these, for some reason?

 

Do we not really know why?

 

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI possibly rather creepy?

 

Is the regime of bot control a problem?

 

Is narrative controlled here?

 

Do the people need to be in control, rather than bots?

Anonymous ID: 92f390 Feb. 11, 2019, 11:48 a.m. No.5124857   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4927

>>5124842

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

Anonymous ID: 92f390 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:09 p.m. No.5125088   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5167

Propaganda tidbit du jour

 

From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"โ€“War, Peace, and the Course of Historyโ€“ (2002)

 

Think about this quotation, and everything it means:

 

"โ€ฆa new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-stateโ€ฆ promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."

 

Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go, but this is flagrant.

 

make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.

 

Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"โ€“ which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.

 

Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."

He then says "now a new form is coming, cuz it's the historical law"โ€“ and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"

Anonymous ID: 92f390 Feb. 11, 2019, 12:14 p.m. No.5125167   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5125088

And in reality "maximize the opportunity of the people" might be plausibly thought to be the driving impulse behind a change to "market-state", but in point of fact, in the actual world we are in, it is being used as a fig leaf to cover the fact that entrenched capitalist power is now not only bending the state for its own welfare, as it has been for a long time, but is consolidating control to such an extent that they are trying to ease explicit devolution of political rights in favor of that capitalist power structure.