EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED
What is organic here?
What is infiltrated here?
What controls 4chan?
How is narrative controlled?
How important is social media?
How important are "chans"?
What is infiltrated?
How is 4chan controlled?
What is identical here and on 4chan?
Is that organic?
When did this board form?
Is this board "just another chan"?
Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?
What is organic?
How would we know?
What happened circa 2015?
For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao
>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.
What happened?
Was 4chan a threat?
Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?
Was the internet a threat?
What happened circa 2015?
Was something rolled out?
Was something implemented?
Was a control regime implemented?
What are tech giants doing with all their AI?
What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?
Etc?
What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?
And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?
So what is in control of "the chans"?
Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?
What populates this board?
Use logic.
What is in control here?
What is in control of the internet?
What happened circa 2015?
Propaganda tidbit du jour
From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"–War, Peace, and the Course of History– (2002)
Think about this quotation, and everything it means:
"…a new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-state… promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."
Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.
make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.
Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"– which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.
Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."
He then explains how history is now moving to a new form– and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"
And it's not a question of "privatization" versus "state control"– the problem is that privatization is being used to essentially dissolve the state as a political force, and with it the peoples power. Traditional discussion of private versus state didn't take this extreme into account, and assumed everything happens within a stable state that isn't being usurped.
What did Q mean by this?
Why is THIS board where you choose to post your "materials"?
The power of the actual plutocratic structure that is in place needs to be broken. All other questions are moot until that happens. It is a war now, not a question of debating issues.
The importance of addressing the propaganda is to understand how the game has been run, and get a good clear view of what the artificial ecosystem of narratives is composed of.