How does [A S] get to claim "more than circumstantial but less than direct" evidence of "collusion" re: Trump/Russia when there is recorded audio of [A S] talking to a Russian that he believed to have dirt on Trump?
How does [A S] get to claim "more than circumstantial but less than direct" evidence of "collusion" re: Trump/Russia when there is recorded audio of [A S] talking to a Russian that he believed to have dirt on Trump?