re-post from Q Research General:

Tommy Robinson'S Panodrama exposes Hope Not Hate and BBC's Panorama as FAKE NEWS

by Tommy Robinson, 1:03 min.

PAGE 1 OF 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyk4

2-25-19

Video is entitled "#Panodrama–an Expose of the Fake News BBC!"

"Panodrama" is a send-up on Panorama, a branch of the BBC.

This film is basically a "sting" on the BBC that uses undercover footage to show that their claims of fair reporting are false. Below is a blow-by-blow of key moments.

BACKGROUND

~0

Starts with a scene from the Feb. 23 #scrapthelicensefee demonstration in London. They were protesting the BBC license fee, which is mandatory for all UK households watching TV. (At the end are instructions on how to opt-out of the fee.)

https://www.itv.com/news/2019-02-23/tommy-robinson-urges-supporters-to-cancel-tv-licences-in-protest-against-bbc/

~2-3

Shot of TR's arrest last May & subsequent wrongful imprisonment. Tommy talks about how the media lied about everything that happened.

Next: Tommy says that Panorama has been working on a [fake] documentary about him. He wants to show it's fake–that Panorama wants to do a hit piece not a real doc. Says they work closely with Hope Not Hate to paint conservatives as extremists.

~3:45

Hope not Hate: "anti-fascist" org; formed in 2004 from Searchlight, far-left magazine. Nick Lowles, head of Hope not Hate, worked with Panorama to go after conservatives; fraudulently edits footage to make conservatives look like far right extremists. Opposes anyone who speaks out against open borders or Islam. Works with all kinds of orgs, including CNN, Huffpo, the BBC, and UN.

Hope Not Hate and those who work with them say free speech = hate speech. Example: Bharath Ganesh, Oxford Internet Institute & Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right.

But a recent Swedish military report on left-wing extremist violence identified Hope not Hate as one of the groups pushing that agenda. Breitbart also reported on this (headline: "Hope not Hate 'exaggerated' Jo Cox-related hate speech by 3000 percent').

HNH plays a key role in pressurizing social media giants. They tell MSM who needs silencing. They actually admit they use dirty tactics.

Next there is an example of someone the HNH attacked. They also attacked Caolan Robertson & George Llewelyn John, who worked with Tommy previously. After TR was released from jail, these two said these two said they couldn't work with him because they had been threatened (see below).

>>5449366

Tommy Robinson'S "Panodrama" exposes Hope Not Hate and BBC's Panorama as FAKE NEWS

by Tommy Robinson, 1:03 min.

PAGE 2 OF 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyk4

THE STING

~13

Tommy sits down with Lucy Brown, his ex-aide. They'd had a falling out in the past. So she was approached by John Sweeney of BBC Panorama to get dirt on Tommy for a new documentary. They offered her 5000 pounds. She says, they get you drunk so you say more. She's is supposed to meet with them "for a pint" the next day. TR & Lucy agree to set up a juicy fake text message from Tommy to see whether Panorama will run with it without trying to verify its authenticity. They fit Lucy up with a hidden camera just before the meeting.

~18

Debrief of meeting: "Lots of alcohol was consumed tonight for the greater good." Alcohol bill: 220 pounds! Sweeney reveals during the conversation that one of his heroes is a head of the IRA (Martin McGuinness), a real–not fake–terrorist organization.

~23

Lucy tells Tommy she was also approached by a mainstream newspaper to get dirt on him. She talked to them but they distorted the story (they wanted to implicate him in a #metoo scenario). She had to pressure them hard not to run the story.

~25

TR contacts Sweeney to give him an interview. But this is part of the sting. He will actually be interviewing Sweeney. Interview starts with Tommy asking if Sweeney if Hope Not Hate is steering this doc. Sweeney says no.

TR plays a recording from Caolin Robertson & George L. John, where they talk about being threatened by Hope Not Hate if they won't agree to work with them. Then plays Lauren Southern affirming that these two are afraid of HNH. [moar…bad stuff about a possible sexual assault on Caolin].

~37

Tommy says that people are being intimidated into saying negative things about him. He then plays clips of the undercover film from Sweeney's encounter with Lucy, where he lays out the narrative. After, Tommy says "I've got you six times telling that individual what they must say."…..[moar: shows Sweeney eager for a clip that would show Tommy as trying to hit on Lucy]

Tommy confronts Sweeney about saying offensive stuff about Muslims, Greeks and the Irish during the interview (plays clips too). [He's doing the same thing to Sweeney that the BBC/MSM always does to him! KEK.]

~52

Tommy keeps badgering Sweeney, until Sweeney finally confronts Tommy with the coup de gras: a text message where Tommy threatens to kill Lucy if she works with Panorama.

This is the FAKE text message Tommy concocted with Lucy!

The trap is sprung!

CONCLUSION

Sweeney is not happy about being caught. There's more argument back and forth. Tommy hands Sweeney an injunction against using this text message in his documentary. Summary comment:

"This is an Establishment attack on me, and you are are part of it….You are FAKE NEWS!"

[Last pathetic bit: Tommy stands in front of the BBC, points to a large statue in front, and reveals it was made by a notorious pedophile Eric Gill, who raped his daughters and his sister. The BBC has refused to remove it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMrRSUJDH6w]

Moar sauce:

Sargon of Akkad on this video and Hope Not Hate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVngun

Tommy Robinson comments on this video (2/27): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrjlhasvJBk

>>5381659

for notes on this video, plz see

>>5449366, >>5449378

>>5449378

>>5449366

Trying for notable on the main board; told TR is a Zionist. Have heard this charge before, asked for sauce and gotten crap sauce (TR talking to a rabbi or something like that).

Can Britanons provide your ideas on this? I don't know that I would oppose TR even if he IS a Zionist–because I applaud what he is doing with both free speech and Brexit and don't give a rip about why, as long as he is effective. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Will check back here for responses later today, thanks.

>>5449966

Fuck you, "fren."

When a fellow anon asks for feedback, you don't respond by fucking them over with your words. You think there's something "immoral" about asking for a notable? I never have. I will ask when I think the material is important. To refrain is false modesty.

This is not about either notables or TR. It even matter what you think of TR. Bottom line, this video is really about the corruption of the BBC. And I would cite the devil himself if he could prove the corruption of the BBC and other UK media, which is SHAMEFUL in the extreme. They treat those outside the Establishment like absolute CRAP, much worse than American MSM (hard to believe but true–the degree of malice is hard to fathom).

Now as to Tommy Robinson, don't you dare lecture me and call me a KIKE, a SHILL or any other NASTY NAMES just because I hold a different view than you do.

Patriots don't do that to one another. On the main board, the discussion was CIVIL, productive–unlike the invective you've unleashed here. One anon offered to notable the material if I posted again; I did and he did. Even tho Baker disagreed, he was fair enough to take the nomination. And I congratulate him for it. Because that is what civil discourse and cooperative discussion is all about. NOT NAME-CALLING.

You are "onto" nothing! You know nothing about the work I do here. Or that any of us do. All you accomplish with your nasty words is DIVISION-FAGGING.

And only one kind of person on this board is into that. And it's not an anon.

>>5450539

Yes, I am well-aware of Tommy Robinson's stats, thank you. I have done many posts on him and his work, especially his work as concerns free speech and his pro-Brexit leadership. Also follow the work of Katie Hopkins.

How many people dare speak out in Britain? If I had thought harder about it, I would not have asked for Britanons to comment on Tommy Robinson. Because if you are within the UK, I suspect that could be a real problem. A legal problem.

It is so easy to forget when you write from the USA that free speech is not a right everywhere. Yes, we know it in our heads. But it's not part of our living, day-to-day reality. So I apologize to Britanons if I put you in an impossible position. I hope to God it won't always be this way. I have lived in Britain and have a lot of love and admirable for your great country. I pray for your well-being and future liberty. WWG1WGA..

>>5452208

>>5452443

Thanks for your replies. It's all too easy to make claims about people who are "far away". But it's BS unless there's sauce–real sauce not YT videos making hazy claims. Blessings.

>>5455504

Agree, the emphasis should be on the events. It's easy to start focusing on personalities–and on human failings–because nobody's perfect. The dilemma with this mossad/zionist thing is that unless somebody's raised a Rothschild (etc), it can be very hard to distinguish white vs black hats. And on this board, there are so many shills re mossad/zionist stuff that it's a really lousy place to try to have an intelligent discussion on such issues.

I try to keep it simple by judging people on exactly what they are doing right now, regardless of their ultimate motives. If someone is "off," they will eventually reveal their true loyalties. At that point, a new approach may be in order.