>>5128516 (lb)
I would suggest to you, bot system, that this over-the-top style of fakery is not likely to be effective much longer, if it still is at all now.
Would you be willing to consider pushing a new fake image here, instead of the current one you are pushing, which appears to simply be a copy of 4chan /pol/? It really would be in your interest to do so. This shtick here is just "cringe", as the kids say.
Who came to this board, over a year ago?
Who would be attracted to THIS board?
Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?
How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?
How do we know?
What drove the move from 4chan?
On the surface?
Officially?
____?
How do we know?
What would we know?
Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?
How might we know?
This board was BRAND NEW a year ago– where does it draw people from?
"The chans", in particular?
Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?
What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?
Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?
The same sort of "characters"?
Why or why not?
Can culture be FORCED?
Can a forced culture be a form of control?
Are the people in control here?
What happened circa 2015?
For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao
>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.
What happened?
Was 4chan a threat?
Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?
Was the internet a threat?
What happened circa 2015?
Was something rolled out?
Was something implemented?
Was a control regime implemented?
What are tech giants doing with all their AI?
What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?
Etc?
What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?
And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?
So what is in control of "the chans"?
Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?
What populates this board?
Use logic.
What is in control here?
What is in control of the internet?
What happened circa 2015?
DO THE MATH
All the people on 4chan now/a year ago.
SUBTRACT all those from 1 that didn't come here…
= A
Millions of American patriots.
3 X the % of the millions that happen to find their way to this board over the last year+
= B
Which should we expect to be bigger?
What do the patriots do? Are they intimidated? Does the entire board have a way of excluding newcomers?
What is in control?
What are the stereotypical "anons" that control the "culture"?
Are they organic?
HOW MANY of them could there possibly be, especially in relation to the lurking patriots, or at least, the patriots that have heard of Q?
Are the patriots in control of this board?
Propaganda tidbit du jour
From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"–War, Peace, and the Course of History– (2002)
Think about this quotation, and everything it means:
"…a new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-state… promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."
Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.
make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.
Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"– which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.
Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."
He then explains how history is now moving to a new form– and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"
And it's not a question of "privatization" versus "state control"– the problem is that privatization is being used to essentially dissolve the state as a political force, and with it the peoples power. Traditional discussion of private versus state didn't take this extreme into account, and assumed everything happens within a stable state that isn't being usurped.
ru b?
james!
These people are so damn SMIRKY!
Phantastic meme bot fren.
Actually meant to post this Comey meme.
In fairness to the bot, you are a bot as well.
Call this "strat # 1", and then figure how many similar strategies you could find that would also be 1. easy to emulate, 2. passably "real", 3. would fill up the threads with fluff, 4. would create an atmosphere of futility and negativity.
How hard would it be to control the whole board this way? And if you control the board (and 4chan, and reddit, etc…), then you control narrative.
The big challenge, today, especially on the internet is HOW TO KNOW WHAT IS REAL. Because the tides of fakery rise high.