Anonymous ID: 26545a Feb. 11, 2019, 10:15 p.m. No.5136683   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6710

>>5136445

I think it's a sort of "supershilling" scenario. Shills know that when they try to distract from a subject, they draw attention to it. So, rather than trying to shill away from Mossad, they try to shill toward Mossad and sow confusion.

 

I think the issue of who is whom is a little more complicated. Israel as a nation is being used - willingly or unwillingly - as a sort of bait for the whole world to get hooked by. Then you have your NWO meeting behind the Seal of Solomon to put their chosen/lineage into power in various regions.

 

It's not a straightforward situation, but the goal of the shills is to try and translate the discussion into something straightforward and simplistic. The more basic they can make the argument, the better they can deflect rational people.

 

It won't work, but it does make it a bit more difficult to have a reasonable conversation about the higher echelons of control and who seats them in what relative authority, since it's not as simple as "da joos" - but the jewish groups within many nations are most certainly involved with the cabal, if not comprising it.

Anonymous ID: 26545a Feb. 11, 2019, 10:32 p.m. No.5136906   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6967

>>5136814

Generally speaking, this is true.

Even if an anon isn't a shill, if they are being stupid, it's best to simply enjoy the scroll rather than try to teach them to draw with the crayons rather than eat them.

 

Unless you're just in that kind of mood.

You don't always have to 'wear the same hat' as an anon. Free speech and anonymity mean you have no real lasting reputation to uphold. A lot of shills are probably just victims of "inductive shilling" - where they just can't help but take the bait to the slide. Of course, one kek's slide is another kek's slanted dig… So…