>>5136108 (lb)
>>5136175 (lb)
>>5136146 (lb)
>Whomever POTUS points to….
>46
there is that number again
I did not mean to imply it was Whitaker, but I seem to have made that case. I
do actually think it has more to do with JFK, Jr and maybe my fear of being
called an rshill caused me to mute this too much. Checkout the analysis of the
Farm Bureau speech to see what I mean.
>Why didn't we do this when Obama was in office?
that you have to ask this questions means you need to go back to facebook
>It just doesn't follow that the victims of any DS crimes that POTUS points out or refers to, 'are still alive'. Extrapolating the latter from the unrelated value of the former, is what turned people off the subject.
Anyone who believes it is encouraged by some 2 things:
1) there is a tight window, that if it passes one is safe to assume that said victim is not alive - there's no Elvis/Tupac bullshit going on here
2) the "communications" that anons pick out indicated that said victim in this case is still alive
3) finally, if said victim was actually killed then that would put a huge failure on the shoulders of whomever has been planning and executing The Plan for supposedly decades - i.e., allowing the DS to get the son of the person whose assassination sparked this whole thing indicates they're not as great at their job as we're lead to believe…I have faith though, so am encouraged to believe that the man is still alive - for now