>>5136869 lb, >>5136872 lb

Ah, here we are. Interdasting.

You're still trying to drive this wedge aren't you?

Or should I say, aren't "u"?

I said during the rally, I'm the baker you keep trying to make into some wronged martyr for the cause. But there's no there there. BV pointed out JIDF/MOS playing both sides of the issue and baker took in the new info and adjusted, like all good researchers do. There is no censorship here, no quashing of of the JQ. When new information is posted critical of Jews or of Israel, we include it. This same BV had no problem with the same baker in the kitchen now including posts of a series of revisionist WWII history, even though JIDF faggots shrieked holy hell over it. Your attempts to make it seem we're not allowed full discretion as bakers, or that our bakers purposefully censor info critical of Jews or Israel, is unfounded. And it will go nowhere. As long as you keep spreading lies, I'll keep coming on to counter them. You're only here for a paycheck. I'm here to save my country. You won't wear me down. You won't wear any of us down.

>>5137146

Look at the post right above yours, faggot.

It's not working. We know you're just here to spread FUD

>>5137232

Baker, see this post:

>>5137145

There's been anons pushing this for weeks now. But last few days it's ramped up. I think it's a campaign. Stand your ground. We've got your back.

>>5137270

>that post right above his is your fucking post faggot.

Yeah I know ffs. Not trying to pull a fast one. But the fact you went right there says more about you than me, has (((projection))) written all over it in fact.

>Only when that post calls out mossad and faggots like u are here

I post so much info critical of Jews and Israel here, I name them, support other anons that do, and carefully and thoughtfully explain the thorny issue of Jewish Subversion in the occasional effort-post for newfags. And when I bake, I put the same types of posts in notables. Of all anons and bakers here, I have to be one of the most outspoken on this issue. I'm not fucking Mossad, I'm just a goyim trying to open eyes to it.

But I also understand that we're here to follow Q's lead in strategic redpilling, that we're here to expose cabal fuggery wherever it shows, not just to make a show of exposing one facet of it, that we have to take things in stages, not go too hard too fast. If you're a legit anon, you need to cool your shit and quit acting like a shill. But the fact that there's this targeted campaign to make hay of an issue in Meta that happened six weeks ago makes me suspect you're not legit at all. Either way, I'll be here to keep shedding light on shit you're misrepresenting, and on patterns I see.

>>5137378

I'm a Christian by heritage, but not by upbringing. I have, however, come to accept the bible as truth via study, as a scientist, a student of literature/metaphor, and a dabbler in history/classics/linguistics. How 'bout you?

>>5137463

Truth does exist, and it will continue to exist no matter how many of us see it clearly. It makes no judgments on how you find it, nor is it vulnerable to your doubts. It's always there, and will always come nearer to you the more you seek it. Don't lose heart. Keep drilling down as best you can. Wherever any of us is our journey to truth, we are all brothers on that walk, we all stumble along the way.

>>5137477

>You didnt answer my question…

I did answer the bigger issue, but let me address this one in particular then:

>>Since when is it normal for a post that calls out shill tactics, receives 10 notable recommendations, and still doesnt make it into notables??

Since that particular issue also tracks with known shill tactics. Since we know JIDF/MOS also poses as pro-JQ posters, we have to be on the lookout for that. Does it also poison genuine discourse on the JQ? Of course it does, that's the point.

We have to work under fire as best we can. You like to reference that Meta convo as evidence of fuggery, but if you're instead a legit anon struggling with how hard it is to work under JIDF/MOS pressure, you should study it from the perspective of how a true proponent of discussion of the JQ had to take a step back and level up to the sophistication of the game afoot. I was the one under scrutiny there. If I could take it like a man, so can you. Dig actual facts about current crimes and actual connected dots between individuals, and when they "happen" to be Jewish, point it out. That's what will redpill normies, not swimming in the current of deliberate both-sides drama of our enemy.