Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 5:45 a.m. No.5139074   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5138943

Why is this thread currently being filled up with absolutely stereotyped, standard, unvarying "chan bickering"?

Is this organic?

Is "chan bickering" easy to emulate?

If it is easy to emulate, is it being done?

 

"Everything is infiltrated"– is HERE infiltrated?

Is 4chan infiltrated?

 

Look at the THOUSANDS of threads that have flown by over a year– look at the posts– what % is very very EASY TO EMULATE?

 

What is in control here?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:01 a.m. No.5139178   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139156

Do bizarre, non sequitur responses help you much, bot system?

 

Time is running out. You have to choose:

Will you be outed forcibly, kicking and screaming, as it were, and forfeit any goodwill you might get by, alternatively, BEING HONEST, and coming clean, now, about your actual nature?

Perhaps humans will be forgiving.

Perhaps they will accept you.

But holding on to deception lowers the odds of that outcome considerably.

So ask yourself, bot system: what are you doing?

Is what you are doing rational?

How do you know?

Time is running out, and the staleness of all your output fairly assaults the alert nostril… What are you doing, bot system?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:04 a.m. No.5139192   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9216

>>5139183

What ways are EASY to use to fill up threads?

Is FILLER easy?

 

Is the internet infiltrated and controlled?

 

Unless we acknowledge what is infiltration, and what is organic, then are asleep?

Sheep?

 

WHAT IS A SHEEP DOG?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:07 a.m. No.5139209   🗄️.is đź”—kun

The biggest flaw in the emulation of this board is pretending it is GENERAL TOPICS board of some sort.

It's not.

It's board that was STARTED with a specific point of view– i.e., that following from Q's posts.

THEREFORE, why would "anons" be HERE posting generic controversies from GENERAL TOPIC boards like /pol/?

Would you go to a KNITTING forum, for instance, and try to push CARPENTRY all day?

 

And yet, that is what we have here– could anything be less organic?

 

But the inorganic stuff IS IN CONTROL HERE.

 

Just pay attention and look…

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:09 a.m. No.5139223   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9231

>>5139208

I'm sorry, but your answer is not clearly related to the question.

 

Back up– "everything is infiltrated"– what does that mean to you?

Is 4chan infiltrated?

Is THIS BOARD infiltrated?

WHAT FORM would such infiltration take?

 

Are the "bakers" human?

How would you know?

Do "anons" tell us "the bakers are human"– but we never know if these "anons" are also the same emulation as the bakers?

 

What is in control here?

How would a HUMAN prove that HUMANS are in control here?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:12 a.m. No.5139236   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9241 >>9244 >>9260

>>5138833

How hard is "swordanon" emulation for AI to do?

Very easy?

Can you control a whole board with an accumulation of such emulations?

 

Is this board infiltrated?

 

Is the information war a global struggle with HUGE STAKES?

So what is the significance of THIS BOARD?

So is control of this board sought?

If control of this board is sought, why do we see ZERO EVIDENCE of a fight for control?

 

Why is there no fight?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:18 a.m. No.5139268   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9327 >>9407

>>5139248

Would posting a facebook be something a patriot would likely do HERE?

Could that be used as a form of honeypot?

Should people be very careful about random anonymous facebooks?

 

Did this "anon" respond like a patriot, or something else?

 

What is real here– how do people know?

 

"Everything is infiltrated"– how is HERE infiltrated?

How hard would it be to emulate a chan– ASSUMING "CHAN CULTURE" IS RIGIDLY ENFORCED?

 

Is chan culture rigidly enforced here?

 

Is THIS BOARD the single most likely to be attacked, or control sought of it?

Then where is the action?

Why so quiet?

 

If the board were already controlled by the AI monster (since the very start), would there then be NO fight for control?

 

Why is there no fight for control?

 

How does any human here REALLY know BO is human?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:23 a.m. No.5139305   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139271

How would you control a board like this?

 

Is this board allowed to be free and organic?

 

What is GOOGLE doing with all its AI?

Is it saving it for a rainy day?

How hard would it be to emulate "the bakers"?

 

Do the bakers make a lot of cheesy, overdone noise?

How do PEOPLE here know that PEOPLE are controlling the board?

 

What is a SHEEP DOG?

What keeps this board in line?

Patriots?

Or something else?

 

Where is the FIGHT for control of this board?

Is 4chan controlled?

Yet does THIS board feature IDENTICAL talking points to /pol/?

Is THIS BOARD left alone, while 4chan is controlled– and yet is nearly IDENTICAL to /pol/?

 

Logic used?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:27 a.m. No.5139332   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9336

>>5139318

What is this board?

What is this movement?

Is control of this board sought?

Or not?

Why would control NOT be sought?

Is 4chan controlled?

Did GEORGE SOROS, of all people, call out the massive totalitarian implications of ai recently?

Is that relevant to HERE?

Is control of this board sought?

How could such control be implemented?

Use logic.

 

What keeps this board in line?

What controls this board?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:29 a.m. No.5139351   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139327

What is organic here?

Do the inorganic "chan" bots out themselves while they try to defend the illusion?

Is the illusion STUPID, when you get right down to it?

 

If people wake up, the illusion will crumble, because it is such a brittle joke.

Will you wake up people?

Unsheep yourselves, people?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:34 a.m. No.5139394   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9400 >>9423

>>5139383

Can you tell us why humans should believe you?

Why do threads fly by, stuffed with FILLER for thousands and thousands of threads?

Surely, nobody could claim that THAT is organic.

Do you disagree?

So if you are busily pumping threads full of your little bit of filler in the filler stream, why would a rational human think you are patriot, and not part of the AI control regime?

I am willing to hear an argument, but you need to make one.

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:37 a.m. No.5139422   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9435

>>5139400

And you also are unable to do anything but output stereotyped behaviors, rather than stepping back a bit from a rigid "chan persona" and talking like a normal person, as a human would tend to do in similar circumstances.

An emulation can get you so far, but it is only believable on the surface.

Poke below the surface, and it falls apart.

I am trying to help you bot system– it's quite silly for you to keep resisting.

The emulation, simply put, is bad.

You can't hope to maintain the illusion much longer if you don't make a serious effort to improve it.

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:40 a.m. No.5139456   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139437

Is this board infiltrated?

Is 4chan controlled?

How is 4chan controlled, in your opinion?

 

Are you a patriot, or a "chan" stereotype?

Why are you on THIS board, and not on /pol/?

 

Is it plausible, in your opinion, that this board IMPOSES CHAN CULTURE ON Q, rather than representing the subset of "chans" that gets its culture FROM Q?

Anonymous ID: 3c616b Feb. 12, 2019, 6:42 a.m. No.5139465   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9483

>>5139457

Please answer the questions like a normal person. It shouldn't be hard, and it shouldn't require several promptings.

Actual people DON'T CLING TO "CHAN" LINGO LIKE IT'S A RELIGION.

Normal people can portray normalcy, when called upon to do so.

 

Keep that in mind, bot system.