>>5138771

>Could you control narrative by controlling this board?

>

>How would you control this board?

>

>Emulate a harsh, exclusive culture?

>

>Emulate "anons" that will scare newcomers away?

>

>Keep them silent?

>

>Allow fake "anons" to dominate?

right. and chan culture suddenly became so unforgiving in 2015 cuz muh infiltration. or was that some other brock butt buddy yesterday shillin that shit?

ur claim makes exactly zero sense. chan culture is what it is and its been that way since long before Q. (((you))) claim that Q chose /pol cuz the harsh, exclusive culture leads to controlling the narrative and so on. yes, this anon agrees. and in the last 18 months this board has scared the shit out of the political establishment. front page WAPO, Huff, NYT and so on through a demonstrated ability to drive a politically incorrect narrative into the mainstream.

it isnt fake. it is happening no matter what shareblue, brock or any other cabal media whore thinks. youre fake. and gay. and should fucking kys sooner rather than later.

>>5138956

>Q picked 4ch because of the free info flow. He left it because it is compd. He was very clear about it.

the comped nature of /pol had exactly nothing to do with the harsh nature of the board or how the autists operate. it was all about the mods and (some of ) the bakers.

Q was indeed clear about it. and this anon thinks that Q is also very clear on the harsh and exclusive nature of the culture. it is a feature not a bug. every revolution requires patriots that are angry to some degree. or better, it requires patriots that know the joy of battle that stems from righteous anger that is channeled into destroying evil. not every statesmen is a Madison or Jefferson. some are Paine and Henry.

>>5139080

>What basis do you have for assuming that Q would PUBLICALLY signal every move?

where the fuck did i say that? that would be a colossally stupid thing to think.

the view that Q chose the chans only for free flow of information and without any reference to the types of people that frequent the boards and drive the discussion is fucking naive. if there were even a minimal amount of concern over the culture and how it manifests itself Q would have found a way to indicate that by now. so given that there has been no indication that the culture is a problem, ill continue to hold that its a feature. i sometimes know why moves are made because i spend a good deal of time working with and modifying complex systems that most fuckwits wouldnt touch with a ten foot pole.

>5139192

>Unless we acknowledge what is infiltration, and what is organic, then are asleep?

(((your))) inorganic bullshit is recognized and acknowledged. (((your))) memes have always sucked - especially the one from last year that tried to mash up soros, popper and wittgenstein when you dont have a fucking clue what popper and wittgenstein had to say.

time to change up strategy again shill. this one aint workin any better than the last.