Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 4:39 a.m. No.5138753   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8761 >>8807

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

 

Do the math anonsโ€“ how infiltrated is THIS board?

How infiltrated?

How can you infiltrate things?

Internet?

Back end?

Or____?

 

Was a plan put on place?

Could you just flat out censor?

Could you just SHIT DOWN all dissent.

It would you have to create an illusion?

How could to create the illusion?

"Muh Russian bots"โ€“ think PROJECTION

 

What add tech giants doing south all their AI?

How hard is it to emulate "a chan"?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 4:45 a.m. No.5138785   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5138764

Are the PEOPLE waking up?

Are the PEOPLE in control HERE?

Or is an emulation of people in control here?

Are the bakers PEOPLE?

How do you know?

Would control be sought?

"Everything is infiltrated"โ€“ this board?

How would we know?

What sorts of control are available?

Emulated board culture, college with noisy, repetitive "kitchen culture"?

How would passive humans know?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 4:48 a.m. No.5138796   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8829

>>5138784

Really?

What gets posted day after day?

 

What gets RESISTED?

What makes anons MAD.

 

Look bot, for the sake of argument, how would YOU control this board of you had a massive AI capability? Pretend you're the clownsโ€ฆ

What would you do, and how would it differ from this board actually?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 4:54 a.m. No.5138825   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8838

>>5138816

If the fakeness that is imposed on this board is THIS CRUDE AND CLUMSY, then how do they get away with it?

Why won't you wake up and take control PEOPLE?

Why aren't the people able to have a board that isn't flooded with a HIGH VOLUME of fakeness?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 4:57 a.m. No.5138839   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8861 >>8866

>>5138817

Filler + ___?

 

"The JQ"?

Bickering?

Emulated stupidity?

Emulated "violent extremism"?

Emulated racism?

Emulated emotional infantility?

ETC, endlessly?

 

Are these things easy to emulate?

Is the tech available?

How much is emulated here?

 

HOW DO YOU KNOW?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 5 a.m. No.5138855   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5138846

Hour hard is this to emulate:

 

"Right wing conspiracy theorists believe RBG is dead"

 

How hard to SET UP the whole game to smear "conspiracy theorists", EMULATING the beliefs directly into this board to feed the MSM narratives?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 5:05 a.m. No.5138888   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5138875

Are certain posts designed specifically to trigger "plausible" emulations of "traditional" internet bickering?

Is it real?

Or injected here?

 

Do threads ALWAYS fly by, for over a year?

Organic?

What is the benefit of thisโ€“ to whom?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 5:11 a.m. No.5138914   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8933 >>8939 >>9009 >>9120

>>5138890

How does culture CHANGE?

It certainly does, always.

 

Who would be in THIS board?

Patriots?

 

Which anons would come HERE, from 4chan?

Those fixated on IMPOSING "CHAN CULTURE" ON Q?

Or those that are patriots, and prioritized the fight way above chan culture?

Use logic.

 

Who comes here?

Patriots?

Or angry chan guys?

Use logic.

These AREN'T the same thing.

 

Is the anon a patriot?

 

What is this "anon" fighting for? Why?

Why would anyone come HERE to "fight for chan culture"?

Is that realistic?

 

Could you use rigid enforcement of chan culture to maintain control of narrative?

Anonymous ID: c88d56 Feb. 12, 2019, 5:17 a.m. No.5138943   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9074

It's not like "all the chans" are some big open space where "all anons" mix together.

This board must be FOUND.

What "anons" SEEK OUT this board?

Why would they?

What anons would prefer to recreate /pol/ HERE, rather than simply STAYING ON /POL/?

Use logic.

This board has a total different purpose from /pol/โ€“ how do the same talking points and memes get fed into both identically?