Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:46 a.m. No.5139504   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9510 >>0058

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:47 a.m. No.5139510   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9551

>>5139504

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

 

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:49 a.m. No.5139539   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Who came to this board, over a year ago?

Who would be attracted to THIS board?

Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?

How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?

How do we know?

What drove the move from 4chan?

On the surface?

Officially?

____?

How do we know?

What would we know?

Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?

How might we know?

This board was BRAND NEW a year ago– where does it draw people from?

"The chans", in particular?

Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?

What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?

Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?

The same sort of "characters"?

Why or why not?

Can culture be FORCED?

Can a forced culture be a form of control?

Are the people in control here?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:51 a.m. No.5139545   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139525

Do you post on 4chan /pol/, or only here?

Is 4chan controlled?

Is this board controlled?

 

If Q does not favor the implied values your talking points reflect, what brings you here?

Why are your beliefs identical to the fake beliefs used to control 4chan?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:54 a.m. No.5139571   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9599 >>9731

Who gets CENSORED on this board?

 

Is this board said to be "free speech"?

Is it really?

Do SOME people get censored?

Which?

 

How do you control the internet?

How do you control (create) the "alt right"?

How do you control dissent?

How do you control narrative?

How do you feed "the daily dot" with its talking points?

 

What is a SHEEP DOG?

 

Look closely– what is CENSORED here, and why?

What is the purpose?

Is discourse FORCED to stay at a low level?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 6:56 a.m. No.5139599   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139571

Keep in mind, all these posts were made FOR THIS BOARD AND MOVEMENT– and all were CENSORED by BO, when threads were made… what possible reason would there be for this censorship?

What is in control here?

How do you control the internet?

What is a threat to the public narrative?

What is a threat to control here?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:12 a.m. No.5139731   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5139497

>>5139592

>QAnon originated with anonymous posts on racist imageboard 4chan, later moving to even more racist imageboard 8chan

–The daily dot

 

How do you control narrative?

"Anons" post racism– even though COUNTER to Q's actual message.

Does "BO" protect "racist anons" under cover of "free speech" (while actually CENSORING quality contributions >>5139571)?

Do pseudo journalistic entities like "the daily dot" then use the fake "anon" posts to dictate the narrative of "Qanon" to the public?

 

How do the PEOPLE get control back, when this board is infiltrated and controlled by FAKENESS?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:21 a.m. No.5139915   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9930 >>9956

>>5139876

What triggers "ebot" to appear?

What triggers "freddy" to appear?

What triggers "FAKE Q" to appear?

What triggers "the board owner" to appear?

 

Are the people in control here?

What is the importance of this board?

Would it be allowed to develop organically?

Was there a fight for control?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:25 a.m. No.5139977   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0014

>>5139930

Why would you present the two as mutually exclusive?

What controls discourse?

If you can flood the board with countless, superficially plausible bots, can you control the overall image of the board?

Then ship it out to 'the daily dot'?

Is EVERYTHING infiltrated?

What is organic HERE?

 

How much "anon" negativity is FAKE?

How much "anon" VIOLENT EXTREMISM is FAKE (and that is bread and butter for 'the daily dot')

How much "anon" cultishness if FAKE.

 

Read the daily dot closely.

Look at how the fake images CREATED here by bots are PUSHED out to the public as scare tactics…

 

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/qanon-returns/

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:32 a.m. No.5140086   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0190

>>5140058

And what happened to the internet? Was control sought?

 

THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

 

You are George Soros and/or the CIA, etc. circa whenever 4chan's heyday was– mid "aughts"?– and you are thinking to yourself "this will not do, this "hacktivism", this organic political consciousness, etc. We must control this. Let's use AI to control this. We'll turn the whole thing into nazis. This will destroy the organic community, while at the same time allowing us to undermine the natural move to the right that we anticipate is coming, and allow us to control dissent completely…."

 

Now, assuming that happened, WHAT COULD HAVE STOPPED HIM FROM SUCCEEDING? And furthermore, if such a regime of AI control were implemented, IN WHAT WAY WOULD IT LOOK DIFFERENT FROM WHAT /POL/ PRESENTLY IS?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:34 a.m. No.5140115   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0134 >>0146

>>5140083

And explain why you spend your time ON THIS BOARD when

  1. you claim to disagree with the entire spirit of it

and

  1. There is a strong social pressure to stay away from this board (due to ridicule in public discourse)

What possible reason would you have for staying here to fill up threads with oppositional talking points?

Should this seem organic to any thinking human?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:36 a.m. No.5140144   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5140109

By whom?

Patriots?

Is that believable?

Is the "handing out of black pills" IDENTICAL to what happens on 4chan?

Is your very style of talking in this post identical to chan styles of talking?

Is the culture here organic, or FORCED?

How did "chan culture" get here, a year ago, and get ENFORCED?

 

If you wanted to control the internet with AI, how would you do it?

Would you target THIS board?

Would you use "black pills" as part of your strategy?

Anonymous ID: 8e6159 Feb. 12, 2019, 7:41 a.m. No.5140225   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5140190

Well, obviously control would not and could not be absolute.

There certainly are interesting questions about what happened in 2016.

The fact of the fakeness I am pointing to seems to be only part of the story.

There may have been some organic push that overwhelmed the regime of fakeness at that time.

But the "suddenly 4chan became nazi!" thing could not have been organic, so that is our starting point…