>>5141070 yes
>>5141083 That dig is still relevant…DJT is our leader and he has cast his vote on Kushner. I will go with that unless/until POTUS says otherwise.
Thanks for the "you"!
Yes I have tried to explain about
network latency, device latency, server latency, etc. to the clock anons who wanted to consider seconds significant.
You already told us you are not able to hit it to the second when clicking Send on two devices.
>>5141414 Hydraulic blinders combined with meds will do that.
Q made a mistake once…it was when he thought he made a mistake. :)
> seconds are not significant on such posts
Correct. Q confirmed that seconds are not significant a long time ago.