>>5141753 (PB, reply to Q)

>>5141235 (Q PB)

>why the apostrophe

At least "anon" is short for something (anonymous), so perhaps Q is telling us that it's just Crooked, and Bill will be spared? Ever notice how it's a no-fail whenever "the Clinton's" (Clinton IS) are referenced, even by Q, and we never see "The Clintons", plural? Instead it's "Clinton's", as in "a singular Clinton IS", or belonging to only ONE Clinton.

>>5141963

The only choice is to expose and take them down. Hannity's under contract, so must play by the rules.

Alienated by literally everybody IRL because so many people have no access to, or know OANN exists. People have NO exposure to real news reporting - conditioned to be entertained 24-7. As long as Hannity is with Faux, he will be gag-ordered.