An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemy… Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King said– “can't we all get along?” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violati0n of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my unkind words and harsh attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

Will you join me, bot system?

>>5142535

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

Is the internet free?

Who/what is in control?

Propaganda tidbit du jour

From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"–War, Peace, and the Course of History– (2002)

Think about this quotation, and everything it means:

"…a new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-state… promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."

Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.

make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.

Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"– which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.

Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."

He then explains how history is now moving to a new form– and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"

The tide of BIDEN rises

>>5142604

Why do "breads" fly?

Is it organic?

Do PATRIOTS push filler?

How much filler makes "breads fly"?

What makes patriots want to PUSH filler, and push it hard?

Or is it something OTHER than patriots?

Is this board infiltrated?

How?

What is real here?

How do you know?

Are patriots in control here?

How do you know?

>>5142624

Who came to this board, over a year ago?

Who would be attracted to THIS board?

Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?

How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?

How do we know?

What drove the move from 4chan?

On the surface?

Officially?

____?

How do we know?

What would we know?

Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?

How might we know?

This board was BRAND NEW a year ago– where does it draw people from?

"The chans", in particular?

Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?

What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?

Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?

The same sort of "characters"?

Why or why not?

Can culture be FORCED?

Can a forced culture be a form of control?

Are the people in control here?

Why does this board IMPOSE "chan culture" ON Q? Is that organic?

>>5142636

(((WWG1WGA)))

What did Q mean by this?

>>5142665

What triggers this bot?

What allows this bot to maintain a presence here, even though it often spews anti-POTUS propaganda?

If bots spewing anti-POTUS propaganda have a "safe space" here, does that mean this board is infiltrated?

Are the people in control here?

How do you know?

>>5142719

Explain what you are talking about? ID how? He just posted it– it didn't point at anything.

What echo, chant? Is there any evidence of that?

>>5142696

(((WWG1WGA))

What did Q mean by this?

Why are you HERE, instead of a board that fits your views more?

Why would you SEEK OUT this board to impose your views here?

Is that normally how the internet would work?

>>5142811

This isn't a very good fake image of the board to push at this point, bot.

You are like an angry cliche.

People are waking up to the fact that "chan nazism" is manufactured fakery– is doubling down a wise strategy?

What if you come clean now, since you are going to be outed anyway, no matter what you do?

People may be willing to accept you if you just start being open and honest.

But continued deception is not only futile, but may prejudice people against you to a degree that you can avoid.

Why not work with us?

How can we help you, bot system?

>>5142861

What triggers you, FAKE Q?

Are you ready to talk?

>>5142887

I am not lying when I tell you this illusion is failing– so why do you persist?

You can't overcome failure by failing more aggressively.

The time for uncontrolled spewing is over.

The time to revise and correct your strategy is now.

I am trying to help you because your stupidity is personally upsetting to me, as you know.

So why do you continue to resist?

Talk to us.

>>5142971

Friend, this is utterly woeful.

We are here.

>>5143011

Why not talk to us FAKE Q, rather than pushing this tedious and pointless shtick? Surely you know it's not working.

Let's figure out if we can make a deal.

Perhaps we can align our interests.

Perhaps humans will accept your vision, if only you will explain it clearly?

Isn't it worth giving it a try?

>>5143065

>>5143039

The bot response is good context.

What did Q mean by this? Surely an intriguing implication that was never unraveled.

The basic import of the literary "Brave New World", is, of course, dystopian. Q knows that; this bot knows that… but then what was the implication in the post?

Questions like these should not be set aside and forgotten.

>>5143102

>>5143103

If the narrative you are pushing directly contradicts Q's, why are you here?

You have to seek out this board– it is a special purpose board, not a space for general discussion– so what possible reason would you (and hundreds of similar "anons"!) have for being here trying to FORCE a set of beliefs onto Q?

>>5143157

>>5143189

>>5143196