Anonymous ID: 5dd26e Feb. 12, 2019, 11:17 a.m. No.5143816   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3842 >>3878 >>3884 >>3969 >>4019

"Shall we play a game?"

 

 

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

 

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

Anonymous ID: 5dd26e Feb. 12, 2019, 11:35 a.m. No.5144014   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4047

>>5143980

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

 

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

 

What creates the image of this board? Will this "anon's" angst be featured in 'the daily dot" tomorrow?

Anonymous ID: 5dd26e Feb. 12, 2019, 11:37 a.m. No.5144047   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4061

>>5143980

>>5144014

Because if you pay attention to "anons" quoted in "the daily dot"

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/qanon-returns/

you'll notice they all sound sort of like this "anon".

Is it organic?

Or is it FAKE?

 

Use logic.

 

Is it easy to emulate, or hard?

 

If it's easy, what would stop it from being done?

Anonymous ID: 5dd26e Feb. 12, 2019, 11:42 a.m. No.5144120   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5144095

When you understand that this is a bot, pay attention to what it's saying. Understand how sophisticated the tactics are. Consider how the AI uses data and surveillance to try to respond to mass movements in thought and feeling.

Compare the narratives the bot pushes to those the media pushes.

Once you understand that the game is being played, then you can understand a lot moreโ€ฆ