>>5143425

I was talking about deltas between Q posts on the board. I could be wrong, but I always assumed that there was meaning when Q made posts. Disregard most posts made in response to anon posts as not part of comms, but include any self-replies or open posts.

IE - how many seconds elapse between two Q posts following sec_test. Posts not following a sec_test would not be expected to be significant to the second.

I am not really much of a clock fag - I just have my own weird understanding of Q's posts and patterns. Tweet-tweet delta can be a pointer/index "look here" or "in reference to." Tweet-Q delta would be an append (seconds not significant here) - a sort of footnote to a Q or POTUS statement. Q-Q delta would be structure, plan, countdown.

Or I am radically overthinking it.

>>5143704

I don't think you understand what I am saying.

But, whatever, it's mostly an academic curiosity to see what Q has built. If you want to eat the crayons, I am done trying to color with them.

>>5143790

Anon, I was impatient before Q came on the scene. For some who woke up after or right around Q, or only recently came to terms with the scale of corruption - it is easy to become impatient.

For many of us, though, Q was here to convince us to have patience and that there was a plan. We wouldn't be here if it was not for patience.

When the system is as corrupt as it has become and is as deeply entrenched as it is… You can't just walk in and slap legal cases on the table. It will go nowhere. There are laws regarding what can be used in court, and the people we are looking to nail are very experienced using those laws to evade prosecution. You may capture one or two people lower on the totem pole, but you won't get the core of the problems.

There are other convoluted things in play. Many of these people have or had considerable influence over the stock market - the international economy. Others have links in with crime syndicates (why destroy the mafia when the black ops can hire them as agents?), And still others hold sway over the media (obviously).

You have to disassemble the monster piece by piece. Or - you have to commit to burning the forest. We would rather conserve the forest rather than unleash a wildfire, though.