Sorry, Q, but post proximity to Trump's tweets (which often come several times a day) is not a convincing 'proof' of your legitimacy–in no way does it suggest coordination.
Anons that find it convincing…you embarrass yourselves.
You could try using your own thorough intellect, first.
Why does post proximity confirm legitimacy to you?
Nope. That's all subjective, and there really IS such a thing as coincidence. And the pictures have come from stock before, as we've uncovered….
I'd learn a lot more from IBOR, the tarmac video/audio, and the arrest (not content with firings) of corrupt FBI officials.
A Q supporter meeting the president? That's not a Q revelation. It's association fallacy used to prop up another group's existence that wasn't confirmed.
And a picture taken in california…wowee. I'm sure that shopped AF1 with the Apple logo photo really rocked your world.
You must be used to not supporting any kind of logical argument and resorting to ad hominem.
If this 'movement' can't take due criticism or doubt, it's never actually going to go anywhere.
having doubt in q is one thing but pretending to be him is childish. just so you know.
Found the unable-to-challenge-reasonable-doubtfag.