>QUICK SAY THE WESTERN WALL IS ROMAN!
<BUT IT WAS THE OUTER LAYER WALL OF THEIR TEMPLE
>THE RETARDS WONT CHECK IT! JUST DO IT!
<10-4 I'LL IP HOP AND TAG TEAM! WILL PUSH THE JEWS HATE CHRISTIANS ANGLE!
>AND THE KHAZARIAN BULLSHIT! DONT FORGET IT!
>MORE MUHJEW! I NEED MORE MUHJEW! USE PROJECTION AND TAG TEAMING! AT LEAST 5 IPS!
<BUT BOSS IT WONT LOOK ORGANIC!
>THE MORONS WON'T QUESTION IT TRUST ME, AFTER ALL IM THE BOSS!
AS FOR HIS MEMES, REMEMBER:
while(1) {
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == meme) {
copy_meme();
add_muhjew_keywords();
print_meme(); }
}
>AND START THE TALMUD ANGLE AGAIN!
>TELL THE BOT OPERATOR TO PROJECT AND CALL THE SHILL SPOTTER A SHILL.
below you'll find a sample of spambot activity:
from the early nightshidt breads ago:
spambot garbage #1
>>4949172 disinfo posted by the spambot. no vatican or payseur. only muhjew. Q said it isn't about a specific religion.
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 1:
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 2:
>>4907713 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907242 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907269 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907276 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907470 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907488 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907833 (bot operator trying to blend in)
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 3:
>>4907041 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4906932 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4906996 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 4:
>>4905706 pb
>>4905987 pb
>>4906077 pb
>>4906123 pb
>>4906156 pb
>>4906201 pb
>>4906274 pb
>>4906314 pb
>>4906345 pb
>>4906355 pb
>>4906367 pb
>>4906377 pb
>>4906415 pb
>>4906417 pb
>>4906426 pb
^^^^^^^^^
above is a propaganda spambot
below you will find a detailed spambot analysis:
a shill chatbot analysis - including relevant q posts V2.0
V1.0 of the research:
>>4346883 pb
look at the attached q posts.
The highlighted text explains the behavior of the spam chatbots that are constantly deployed here.
my experiment is described here:
here i trolled the spam chatbot with a reply:
>>4345440 pb
and what do you know?
it gave me an automatically generated text pasta reply:
>>4345586 pb
and posted another 4 posts with a random delta that is in the range [10-30 minutes]:
>>4345586 pb
>>4345666 pb
>>4345825 pb
>>4345962 pb
exactly as q told us more than a year ago!
What they did manage to do during this year is to update their automatic post pattern to be triggered by a reply. Notice that the bot posts a first "common drive post", like q called it, and the subsequent 4 posts will all tap into this one.
To summarize, lets get back to the q post.
similarly to what is written in the q post, the spambot uses a 5 prong pre packaged injection, only this time it has a precursor post serving as bait. After an anon takes the bait and replies, the bot searches for "negative" keywords ("bot", "r2d2", "spam", "shill", etc). If it found these words, then the 5 prong pre packaged delivery is injected, meaning 5 automatic posts are inserted, with the first one auto generating the other 4 posts at random designated times with deltas in a range of 10 to 30 minutes. Note that all 4 posts are linked to each other, forming a chain of posts with a common driver (root).
Then, as q said, "shills log and send new info back to ASF for instruction." with ASF probably referring to the APACHE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION.
see attached snip taken from:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Also as you may or may not remember, Q used "APACHE" as a signature, and told us to dig it. An anon found out before that it is connected to the Securedrop whistleblower honeypot fiasco, but it could have multiple meaning with one of the being the ASF, or in fact the ASF can be connected to securedrop as well (see attached q snip).
Manual script inserted by a human operator:
on an older bread I played a little trolling game with the spambot. I exposed 3 of his lies on purpose, to see if in fact there is a human operator that can edit the next automatically generated reply, before it gets posted, in real time, via a script. "Trolling is fun".
Here is the experiment:
-
trolled it once:
>>4351198 pb
and received a manually inserted script.
>>4351259 pb
-
trolled it a second time:
>>4351407 pb
and received a manually inserted script to an automatic template.
>>4351463 pb
attached are the snips of the second trolling and reply that included the manual insertion.
my conclusion: there is a human operator that does exactly that, he can manually interupt the automatic generation of posts and either pick a different one or insert a specific line.
>QUICK FAGGOT! POST THE RABBI MEME AGAIN AND PROJECT! SAY "GOY"
<BUT THE MEME IS THE JOKE OF QRESEARCH!
>POST IT OR ITS BROCKS OFFICE FOR YOU!
while(1) {
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == meme) {
copy_meme();
add_muhjew_keywords();
print_meme(); }
}
>MORE RABBI MEMES! SPAM MORE!
<ON IT BOSS!
>AND ADD SOME MUHJEW KEYWORDS TO HIS MEMES!
<10-4
>AND SAY KIKEY! IT ALWAYS WORKS! PROJECT FFS! PROJECT AND TAG TEAM! CALL HIM MOSSAD! SAY THAT MUHJEW SHILLING DOESNT EXIST!
<ON IT BOSS!
^^^^^^^^^
'''above is a propaganda spambot
and now to the final part (my favorite) - a detailed example of a glitch, that proves that it is in fact a (semi automatic) spambot
Look at the attached screenshots. look at the time stamps and then on the post number. Notice that the later post has an earlier post number. THIS HAPPENS WHEN A MULTI-PRONG MESSAGE IS INJECTED
also notice the kvetching of the bot operator.
while(1) {
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == meme) {
copy_meme();
add_muhjew_keywords();
print_meme(); }
}
while(1) {
print "goy, kike, moshe, schlomo, rabbi";
wait_for_reply();
if(reply == high_iq) { print "pilpul";}
elseif(reply == calling_me_a_shill) {print "jidf, what time is it in tel-aviv";}
}
oh hi bot operator! happy to see you stopped by again! enjoy the manual shilling!
below you'll find a sample of spambot activity:
from the early nightshidt breads ago:
spambot garbage #1
>>4949172 disinfo posted by the spambot. no vatican or payseur. only muhjew. Q said it isn't about a specific religion.
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 1:
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 2:
>>4907713 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907242 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907269 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907276 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907470 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907488 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4907833 (bot operator trying to blend in)
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 3:
>>4907041 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4906932 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
>>4906996 (bot operator attempting to blend in)
spambot garbage from nightshift bread 4:
>>4905706 pb
>>4905987 pb
>>4906077 pb
>>4906123 pb
>>4906156 pb
>>4906201 pb
>>4906274 pb
>>4906314 pb
>>4906345 pb
>>4906355 pb
>>4906367 pb
>>4906377 pb
>>4906415 pb
>>4906417 pb
>>4906426 pb
a second muhjew fake and gay shill thread.
same old endlessly pushed, fake and gay shill garbage.
this link debunks all the shill garbage:
http://talmud.faithweb.com/
oh wait, what's this? all that garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!
>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked
The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.
He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:
>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.
>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]
>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216
KEK!
>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.
KEK!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis
oh and here is more:
>The identification of Yeshu as Jesus is problematic. For example, the Talmud mentions Yeshu ben Pandera/ben Stada's stepfather, Pappos ben Yehuda, speaking with Rabbi Akiva,[3] who was executed at the climax of the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE.[4][5] Furthermore, Yeshu the Pharisee student is described as being a student of the second-century BCE nasi Joshua ben Perachiah, as well as being among the exiled Pharisees returning to Israel following their persecution[6][7] by John Hyrcanus,[8], an event which occurred in 74 BC. Additionally, Yeshu the sorcerer was executed by the royal government which lost legal authority in 63 BC. These events would place the lifetime of either Yeshu decades before or after the birth and death of Jesus.[9][10] Still, there are numerous other passages pertaining to an individual named "Yeshu" that either don't provide a specific time period or else specify a time where it is reasonable to assume mentioning of Jesus would even be possible (take for example a notable passage, Gittin 57a mentioning the nobleman Onkelos conjuring the tormented spirit of "Yeshu" – Onkelos lived more than a century after Jesus, thus making it possible the Yeshu mentioned could indeed be Jesus, though the likelihood of this is still questionable) still opening the possibility that whichever Yeshu mentioned might be Jesus. '
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
let the shill kvetching begin!